The prolonged release of dexamfetamine after administration of Venvanse should be considered when treating patients with overdose.
Manifestations of acute overdosage with amfetamines include restlessness, tremor, hyperreflexia, rapid respiration, confusion, assaultiveness, hallucinations, panic states, hyperpyrexia, and rhabdomyolysis. Fatigue and depression usually follow the central nervous system stimulation. Cardiovascular effects include arrhythmias, hypertension or hypotension, and circulatory collapse. Gastrointestinal symptoms include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and abdominal cramps. Fatal poisoning is usually preceded by convulsions and coma.
Management of acute amfetamine intoxication is largely symptomatic and includes gastric lavage, administration of activated charcoal, administration of a cathartic, and sedation. Acidification of the urine increases amfetamine excretion but is believed to increase risk of acute renal failure if myoglobinuria is present. If acute severe hypertension complicates amfetamine overdosage, administration of intravenous phentolamine has been suggested. However, a gradual drop in blood pressure will usually result when sufficient sedation has been achieved.
Lisdexamfetamine and dexamfetamine are not dialysable.
Concomitant use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) or within 14 days after MAOI treatment.
Hyperthyroidism or thyrotoxicosis.
Agitated states.
Symptomatic cardiovascular disease.
Advanced arteriosclerosis.
Moderate to severe hypertension.
Glaucoma.
Not applicable.
Summary of the safety profile
Adverse reactions observed with Venvanse treatment mainly reflect side effects commonly associated with stimulant use. Very common adverse reactions include decreased appetite, insomnia, dry mouth, headache, upper abdominal pain, and weight decreased.
Tabulated summary of adverse reactions
The following table presents all adverse reactions based on clinical trials and spontaneous reporting.
The following definitions apply to the frequency terminology used hereafter:
Very common (> 1/10)
Common (> 1/100 to < 1/10)
Uncommon (> 1/1,000 to < 1/100)
Rare (> 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000)
Very rare (< 1/10,000)
Frequency not known (cannot be estimated from the available data).
An asterisk (*) indicates that additional information on the respective adverse reaction is provided below the table.
| System/Organ Class | Adverse Reaction | Children (6 to 12 years) | Adolescents (13 to 17 years) | Adults |
| Immune System Disorders | Anaphylactic reaction | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | Frequency not known |
| Hypersensitivity | Uncommon | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders | Decreased appetite | Very common | Very common | Very common |
| Psychiatric Disorders | *Insomnia | Very common | Very common | Very common |
| Agitation | Uncommon | Uncommon | Common | |
| Anxiety | Uncommon | Common | Common | |
| Logorrhea | Uncommon | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Libido decreased | Not applicable | Not reported | Common | |
| Depression | Uncommon | Common | Uncommon | |
| Tic | Common | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Affect lability | Common | Uncommon | Common | |
| Dysphoria | Uncommon | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Euphoria | Frequency not known | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Psychomotor hyperactivity | Uncommon | Uncommon | Common | |
| Bruxism | Uncommon | Uncommon | Common | |
| Dermatillomania | Uncommon | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Psychotic episodes | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | |
| Mania | Uncommon | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Hallucination | Uncommon | Uncommon | Frequency not known | |
| Aggression | Common | Uncommon | Frequency not known | |
| Nervous System Disorders | Headache | Very common | Very common | Very common |
| Dizziness | Common | Common | Common | |
| Restlessness | Uncommon | Common | Common | |
| Tremor | Uncommon | Common | Common | |
| Somnolence | Common | Common | Uncommon | |
| Seizure | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | |
| Dyskinesia | Uncommon | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Dysgeusia | Uncommon | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Eye Disorders | Vision blurred | Uncommon | Frequency not known | Uncommon |
| Mydriasis | Uncommon | Uncommon | Frequency not known | |
| Cardiac Disorders | Tachycardia | Common | Common | Common |
| Palpitation | Uncommon | Common | Common | |
| Cardiomyopathy | Frequency not known | Uncommon | Frequency not known | |
| Vascular disorders | Raynaud's phenomenon | Uncommon | Frequency not known | Frequency not known |
| Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders | Dyspnoea | Uncommon | Common | Common |
| Gastrointestinal Disorders | Dry mouth | Common | Common | Very common |
| Diarrhoea | Common | Common | Common | |
| Constipation | Common | Uncommon | Common | |
| Upper abdominal pain | Very common | Common | Common | |
| Nausea | Common | Common | Common | |
| Vomiting | Common | Common | Uncommon | |
| Hepatobilary Disorders | *Eosinophilic Hepatitis | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | Frequency not known |
| Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders | Hyperhidrosis | Uncommon | Uncommon | Common |
| Urticaria | Uncommon | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| Rash | Common | Uncommon | Uncommon | |
| *Angioedema | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | |
| *Stevens-Johnson Syndrome | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | Frequency not known | |
| Reproductive System and Breast Disorders | Erectile dysfunction | Not applicable | Uncommon | Common |
| General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions | Chest pain | Uncommon | Uncommon | Common |
| Irritability | Common | Common | Common | |
| Fatigue | Common | Common | Common | |
| Feeling jittery | Uncommon | Common | Common | |
| Pyrexia | Common | Common | Uncommon | |
| Investigations | Blood pressure increased | Uncommon | Uncommon | Common |
| *Weight decreased | Very Common | Very Common | Common |
Description of selected adverse reactions
Insomnia
Includes insomnia, initial insomnia, middle insomnia, and terminal insomnia.
Weight decreased
In a 4-week controlled trial of Venvanse in children aged 6 to 12 years, mean weight loss from baseline to endpoint was 0.4, 0.9, and 1.1 kg, for patients assigned to receive 30 mg, 50 mg, and 70 mg of Venvanse respectively, compared to a 0.5 kg weight gain for patients receiving placebo. Higher doses were associated with greater weight loss with 4 weeks of treatment. Careful follow-up for weight in children aged 6 to 12 years who received Venvanse over 12 months suggests that continuous treatment (i.e., treatment for 7 days per week throughout the year) slows growth rate measured by body weight as demonstrated by an age- and sex-normalised mean change from baseline in percentile of -13.4 over 1 year. The average percentiles at baseline (n=271) and 12 months (n=146) were 60.9 and 47.2, respectively.
In a 4-week controlled trial of Venvanse in adolescents aged 13 to 17 years, mean weight loss from baseline to endpoint was 1.2, 1.9, and 2.3 kg for patients assigned to receive 30 mg, 50 mg, and 70 mg of Venvanse respectively, compared to a 0.9 kg weight gain for patients receiving placebo. Careful follow-up for weight in adolescents aged 13 to 17 years who received Venvanse over 12 months suggests that continuous treatment (i.e., treatment for 7 days per week throughout the year) slows growth rate measured by body weight as demonstrated by an age- and sex-normalised mean change from baseline in percentile of -6.5 over 1 year. The average percentiles at baseline (n=265) and 12 months (n=156) were 66.0 and 61.5, respectively.
In children and adolescents (aged 6-17) who received Venvanse over two years, careful monitoring of weight suggested that consistent medication (ie, treatment for 7 days per week throughout the two years) resulted in a slowing of growth as measured by body weight. In children and adolescents, the average weight percentiles and standard deviations (SD) at baseline (n=314) and 24 months (week 104, n=189), were 65.4 (SD 27.11) and 48.2 (SD 29.94), respectively. The age- and sex-normalized mean change from baseline in percentile over 2 years was -16.9 (SD17.33).
Eosinophilic hepatitis
No cases were reported in the clinical studies.
Angioedema
No cases were reported in the clinical studies.
Stevens-Johnson syndrome
No cases were reported in the clinical studies.
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme (Website: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard).
In repeat dose toxicity studies the major findings were changes in behaviour, such as increased activity typical of stimulant administration, with associated reductions in body weight gain, growth measurements and food intake, considered to be a consequence of an exaggerated pharmacological response.
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate was not genotoxic when tested in vitro in the Ames test and the mouse lymphoma assay or in vivo in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test. Carcinogenicity studies of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate have not been performed. No evidence of carcinogenicity was found in studies in which d-, l-amfetamine (enantiomer ratio of 1:1) was administered to mice and rats in the diet for 2 years at doses of up to 30 mg/kg/day in male mice, 19 mg/kg/day in female mice, and 5 mg/kg/day in male and female rats.
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate had no effect on embryofoetal development or survival when administered orally to pregnant rats at doses up to 40 mg/kg/day, and rabbits at doses up to 120 mg/kg/day.
No adverse effects on nervous system development or reproductive function were observed following repeat dose administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate to juvenile rats and dogs.
Amfetamine (d- to l-enantiomer ratio of 3:1) did not adversely affect fertility or early embryonic development in the rat at doses of up to 20 mg/kg/day.
A number of studies in rodents indicate that prenatal or early postnatal exposure to amfetamine (d- or d,l-) at doses similar to those used clinically can result in long-term neurochemical and behavioural alterations. Reported behavioural effects include learning and memory deficits, altered locomotor activity, and changes in sexual function. Similar studies have not been conducted for Venvanse.
Venvanse is indicated as part of a comprehensive treatment programme for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 6 years and over when response to previous methylphenidate treatment is considered clinically inadequate.
Treatment must be under the supervision of a specialist in childhood and/or adolescent behavioural disorders. Diagnosis should be made according to DSM criteria or the guidelines in ICD and should be based on a complete history and evaluation of the patient. Diagnosis cannot be made solely on the presence of one or more symptom.
The specific aetiology of this syndrome is unknown, and there is no single diagnostic test. Adequate diagnosis requires the use of medical and specialised psychological, educational, and social resources.
A comprehensive treatment programme typically includes psychological, educational and social measures as well as pharmacotherapy and is aimed at stabilising children with a behavioural syndrome characterised by symptoms which may include chronic history of short attention span, distractibility, emotional lability, impulsivity, moderate to severe hyperactivity, minor neurological signs and abnormal EEG. Learning may or may not be impaired.
Venvanse is not indicated in all children with ADHD and the decision to use the drug must be based on a very thorough assessment of the severity and chronicity of the child's symptoms in relation to the child's age and potential for abuse, misuse or diversion.
Appropriate educational placement is essential, and psychosocial intervention is generally necessary. The use of Venvanse should always be used in this way according to the licensed indication.
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Centrally Acting Sympathomimetics, ATC code: N06 BA12.
Mechanism of action
Venvanse is a pharmacologically inactive prodrug. After oral administration, lisdexamfetamine is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and hydrolysed primarily by red blood cells to dexamfetamine, which is responsible for the drug's activity.
Amfetamines are non-catecholamine sympathomimetic amines with CNS stimulant activity. The mode of therapeutic action of amfetamine in ADHD is not fully established, however it is thought to be due to its ability to block the reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine into the presynaptic neuron and increase the release of these monoamines into the extraneuronal space. The prodrug, lisdexamfetamine, does not bind to the sites responsible for the reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine in vitro.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The effects of Venvanse in the treatment of ADHD has been demonstrated in three controlled trials in children aged 6 to 12 years, three controlled studies in adolescents aged 13 to 17 years, three controlled studies in children and adolescents (6 to 17 years), and four controlled trials in adults who met the DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD.
In clinical studies conducted in children and adults, the effects of Venvanse were ongoing at 13 hours after dosing in children and at 14 hours in adults when the product was taken once daily in the morning.
Paediatric population
Three hundred and thirty-six patients aged 6-17 years were evaluated in the pivotal Phase 3 European Study SPD489-325. In this seven-week randomised double-blind, dose-optimised, placebo- and active-controlled study, Venvanse showed significantly greater efficacy than placebo.
The ADHD Rating Scale is a measure of the core symptoms of ADHD. The placebo-adjusted mean reduction from baseline in patients treated with Venvanse on the ADHD-RS-IV Total Score was 18.6 (p<0.001). At every on-treatment visit and at Endpoint the percentages of subjects who met pre-defined response criteria (a >30% reduction from Baseline in ADHD-RS-IV Total Score and a CGI-I value of 1 or 2) was significantly higher (p<0.001) for Venvanse when compared to placebo. The endpoint of this study is defined in Table 1. The results were also significantly higher for Venvanse when compared to placebo when the individual components of the response criteria were evaluated. In addition, mean scores for ADHD symptoms following treatment discontinuation did not exceed baseline scores prior to treatment, indicating there was no rebound effect.
In addition to a reduction in symptoms, clinical studies have demonstrated that Venvanse significantly improves functional outcomes. Specifically, in Study SPD489-325, 75.0% of subjects on Venvanse showed Improvement (defined as “very much improved†or “much improvedâ€) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) rating scale compared to 14.2% on placebo (p<0.001).
Venvanse showed significant improvement in child achievement in academic performance, as measured by the Health Related Quality of life instrument, Parent Report Form of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Child Edition (CHIP-CE:PRF) Achievement Domain. Venvanse demonstrated a significant improvement from baseline compared to placebo (Venvanse: 9.4 versus Placebo -1.1) with a mean difference between the two treatment groups of 10.5 (p<0.001).
Table 1: Outcome Results for Study SPD489-325 at Endpoint1 (Full Analysis Set)
| Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate | Placebo | Methylphenidate hydrochloride | |
| Change in ADHD-RS IV Total Score | |||
| Least Square Mean | -24.3 | -5.7 | -18.7 |
| Effect size (versus Placebo) | 1.804 | N/A | 1.263 |
| P-value (versus Placebo) | <0.001 | N/A | <0.001 |
| ADHD-RS-IV Responders | |||
| Patients Showing a response2 | 83.7% (87/104) | 22.6% (24/106) | 68.2% (73/107) |
| Difference in response from placebo | 61.0 | N/A | 45.6 |
| P-value (versus Placebo) | <0.001 | N/A | <0.001 |
| CGI-I Responders | |||
| Patients Showing Improvement3 | 75.0% (78/104) | 14.2% (15/106) | 58.9 % (63/107) |
| Difference in improvement from placebo | 60.8 | N/A | 44.7 |
| P-value (versus Placebo) | <0.001 | N/A | <0.001 |
| Change in CHIP-CE: PRF Achievement Domain | |||
| Least Square Mean | 9.4 | -1.1 | 6.4 |
| Effect size (versus Placebo) | 1.280 | N/A | 0.912 |
| P-value (versus Placebo) | <0.001 | N/A | <0.001 |
1 Endpoint = the last on-treatment post-Baseline visit of the dose optimisation or dose maintenance Period (Visits 1-7) with a valid value
2 Response is defined as percentage reduction from Baseline in the ADHD-RS-IV Total Score of >30%
3Improvement (“very much improved†or “much improvedâ€)
Similar results for ADHD-RS and CGI-I have been shown in two placebo controlled studies, one in children (n=297) and the other in adolescents (n=314), both conducted in the United States.
A double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, dose-optimisation study was conducted in children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years (n=267) who met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD. In this nine-week study, patients were randomised (1:1) to a daily morning dose of Venvanse (30, 50 or 70 mg/day), or atomoxetine (dosed as appropriate for the subject's weight up to 100 mg). During a 4-week Dose Optimisation Period, patients were titrated until an optimal dose, based on treatment emergent adverse events and clinical judgement, was reached. Patients treated with Venvanse had a shorter time to first response compared to patients treated with atomoxetine (median 13.0 vs 21.0 days, respectively; p=0.003), where response was defined as having a CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) at any of the double-blind treatment visits. Across all of the double blind treatment visits, the proportion of responders in the Venvanse group was consistently higher than the proportion of responders in the atomoxetine group. The difference ranged from 16-24 percentage points. At the study endpoint the least square mean changes from baseline in ADHD-RS-IV Total Score for Venvanse and atomoxetine were -26.1 and -19.7, respectively, with a between-group difference of -6.4.
Two double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled (OROS-MPH [Concerta]) studies have been conducted in adolescents aged 13-17 years with ADHD. Both studies also included a placebo reference arm. The 8-week dose-optimization study (SPD489-405) had a 5-week dose-optimization period and a 3-week dose-maintenance period. During the dose-optimization period, subjects were titrated once weekly based on TEAEs and clinical response to an optimal dose of 30, 50, or 70 mg/day (for SPD489 subjects) or 18, 36, 54, or 72 mg/day (for OROS-MPH subjects), which was maintained throughout a 3-week dose-maintenance period. The mean doses at endpoint were 57.9 mg and 55.8 mg for SPD489 and OROS-MPH, respectively. In this study, neither SPD489 nor OROS-MPH was found to be statistically superior to the other product at Week 8. The 6-week fixed-dose study (SPD489-406) had a 4-week forced-dose titration period and a 2-week dose-maintenance period. At the highest doses of SPD489 (70 mg) and OROS-MPH (72 mg), SPD489 treatment was found to be superior to OROS-MPH as measured by both the primary efficacy analysis (change from baseline at Week 6 on the ADHD-RS Total score) and the key secondary efficacy analysis (at last study visit on the CGI-I) (see Table 2).
Table 2: Change from Baseline on ADHD-RS-IV Total Score and Endpoint on CGI-I (Full Analysis Set)
| SPD489-405 | Primary at Week 8 ADHD-RS-IV | Placebo | SPD489 | OROS-MPH | |
| Baseline Total Score | N Mean (SE) | 89 38.2 (0.73) | 179 36.6 (0.48) | 184 37.8 (0.45) | |
| Change from baseline at Week 8 | N LS Mean (SE) [a] | 67 -13.4 (1.19) | 139 -25.6 (0.82) | 152 -23.5 (0.80) | |
| Lisdexamfetamine vs OROS-MPH difference | LS Mean (SE) [a] (95% CI) [a] Effect size [b] p-value | NA | -2.1 (1.15) -4.3, 0.2 0.2 0.0717 | NA | |
| Active vs Placebo difference | LS Mean (SE) [a] (95% CI) [a] Effect size [b] p-value | NA | -12.2 (1.45) -15.1, -9.4 1.16 <0.0001 | -10.1 (1.43) -13.0, -7.3 0.97 <0.0001 | |
| Key Secondary Endpoint CGI-I | |||||
| Subjects analysed (n) | 89 | 178 | 184 | ||
| Improved (%) [c] Not improved (%) [d] | 31 (34.8) 58 (65.2) | 148 (83.1) 30 (16.9) | 149 (81.0) 35 (19.0) | ||
| Lisdexamfetamine vs OROS-MPH [e] Active treatment vs Placebo [e] | NA NA | 0.6165 <0.0001 | NA <0.0001 | ||
| SPD489-406 | Primary at Week 6 ADHD-RS-IV | Placebo | SPD489 | OROS-MPH | |
| Baseline Total Score | N Mean (SE) | 106 36.1 (0.58) | 210 37.3 (0.44) | 216 37.0 (0.44) | |
| Change from baseline at Week 6 | N LS Mean (SE) [a] | 93 -17.0 (1.03) | 175 -25.4 (0.74) | 181 -22.1 (0.73) | |
| Lisdexamfetamine vs OROS-MPH difference | LS Mean (SE) [a] (95% CI) [a] Effect size [b] p-value | NA | -3.4 (1.04) -5.4, -1.3 0.33 0.0013 | NA | |
| Active vs Placebo difference | LS Mean (SE) [a] (95% CI) [a] Effect size [b] p-value | NA | -8.5 (1.27) -11.0, -6.0 0.82 <0.0001 | -5.1 (1.27) -7.6, -2.6 0.50 <0.0001 | |
| Key Secondary Endpoint CGI-I | |||||
| Subjects analysed (n) | 106 | 210 | 216 | ||
| Improved (%) [c] Not improved (%) [d] | 53 (50.0) 53 (50.0) | 171 (81.4) 39 (18.6) | 154 (71.3) 62 (28.7) | ||
| Lisdexamfetamine vs OROS-MPH [e] Active treatment vs Placebo [e] | NA NA | 0.0188 <0.0001 | NA 0.0002 | ||
[a] From a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) that includes treatment group, nominal visit, interaction of the treatment group with the visit as factors, baseline ADHD-RS-IV total score as a covariate, and an adjustment for the interaction of the baseline ADHD-RS-IV total score with the visit. The model is based on a REML method of estimation and utilizes an unstructured covariance type.
[b] The effect size is the difference in LS mean divided by the estimated standard deviation from the unstructured covariance matrix.
[c] The 'Improved' category includes responses of 'Very much improved' and 'Much improved'.
[d] The 'Not improved' category includes responses of 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse' and 'Very much worse'.
[e] From a CMH test stratified by baseline CGI-S.
Note: N = number of subjects in each treatment group, n = number of subjects analysed.
A 2-year open label safety study conducted in children and adolescents (ages 6-17) with ADHD enrolled 314 patients. Of these, 191 patients completed the study.
In addition, maintenance of effect was demonstrated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal study conducted in children and adolescents ages 6 to 17 (n=157) who met the diagnosis of ADHD (DSM-IV criteria). Patients were optimised to open-label Venvanse for an extended period (at least 26 weeks) prior to entry into the 6-week randomised withdrawal period. Eligible patients were randomised to continue receiving their optimised dose of Venvanse or to switch to placebo. Patients were observed for relapse (treatment failure) during the 6-week double-blind phase. Treatment failure was defined as a >50% increase (worsening) in the ADHD-RS Total Score and a >2-point increase in the CGI-S score compared to scores at entry into the double-blind randomised withdrawal phase. Treatment failure was significantly lower (p<0.001) for the Venvanse subjects (15.8%) compared to placebo (67.5%). For the majority of subjects (70.3%) who were treatment failures regardless of treatment, ADHD symptoms worsened at or before the week 2 visit following randomisation.
Adult population
The effectiveness of Venvanse in the treatment of ADHD was established in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study conducted in 420 adult patients aged 18 to 55 years who met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD. Significant improvements in ADHD symptoms, based upon investigator ratings on the ADHD-RS with adult prompts total score, were observed for all Venvanse doses compared to placebo. Treatment with Venvanse significantly reduced the degree of functional impairment as measured by improvement on the CGI-I rating scale compared to placebo.
In addition, maintenance of effect was demonstrated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal design study that enrolled adults (n=123) who met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD and who, at study entry, had been treated with Venvanse for a minimum of 6 months. A significantly lower proportion of patients treated with Venvanse met relapse criteria (8.9%) compared to patients receiving placebo (75.0%) in the double-blind randomised withdrawal phase. Relapse was defined as a >50% increase from randomisation in ADHD-RS-IV Total Score and a > 2 point increase in CGI-S score relative to the CGI-S score at randomisation.
Abuse liability studies
In a human abuse liability study, when equivalent oral doses of 100 mg lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and 40 mg immediate-release dexamfetamine sulphate were administered to individuals with a history of drug abuse, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate 100 mg produced subjective responses on a scale of “Drug Liking Effects†(primary endpoint) that were significantly less than dexamfetamine immediate-release 40 mg. However, oral administration of 150 mg lisdexamfetamine dimesylate produced increases in positive subjective responses on this scale that were comparable to the positive subjective responses produced by 40 mg of oral immediate-release dexamfetamine and 200 mg of diethylpropion.
Intravenous administration of 50 mg lisdexamfetamine dimesylate to individuals with a history of drug abuse produced positive subjective responses on scales measuring “Drug Likingâ€, “Euphoriaâ€, “Amfetamine Effectsâ€, and "Benzedrine Effects" that were greater than placebo but less than those produced by an equivalent dose (20 mg) of intravenous dexamfetamine.
Absorption
After oral administration, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract of healthy adults and children (6 to 12 years) with ADHD, thought to be mediated by the high capacity PEPT1 transporter.
Food does not affect the observed AUC and Cmax of dexamfetamine in healthy adults after single-dose oral administration of Venvanse 70 mg capsules but prolongs Tmax by approximately 1 hour (from 3.8 hours at fasted state to 4.7 hours after a high fat meal). After an 8-hour fast, the AUCs for dexamfetamine following oral administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in solution and as intact capsules were equivalent.
Distribution
In 18 children (6 to 12 years) with ADHD, the Tmax of dexamfetamine was approximately 3.5 hours following single-dose oral administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate either 30 mg, 50 mg, or 70 mg administered after an 8-hour overnight fast. The Tmax of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate was approximately 1 hour. Linear pharmacokinetics of dexamfetamine after single-dose oral administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate was established over the dose range of 30 mg to 70 mg in children aged 6 to 12 years.
Weight/dose normalised AUC and Cmax were 22% and 12% lower, respectively, in adult females than in males on day 7 following a 70 mg/day dose of lisdexamfetamine for 7 days. Weight/dose normalised AUC and Cmax values were the same in girls and boys following single doses of 30-70 mg.
There is no accumulation of dexamfetamine at steady state in healthy adults and no accumulation of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate after once-daily dosing for 7 consecutive days.
Biotransformation
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is converted to dexamfetamine and l-lysine, which occurs by metabolism in blood primarily due to the hydrolytic activity of red blood cells. Red blood cells have a high capacity for metabolism of lisdexamfetamine as in vitro data demonstrated substantial hydrolysis occurs even at low hematocrit levels. Lisdexamfetamine is not metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzymes.
Amfetamine is oxidised at the 4 position of the benzene ring to form 4-hydroxyamfetamine, or on the side chain α or β carbons to form alpha-hydroxy-amfetamine or norephedrine, respectively. Norephedrine and 4-hydroxy-amfetamine are both active and each is subsequently oxidised to form 4-hydroxy-norephedrine. Alpha-hydroxy-amfetamine undergoes deamination to form phenylacetone, which ultimately forms benzoic acid and its glucuronide and the glycine conjugate hippuric acid. Although the enzymes involved in amfetamine metabolism have not been clearly defined, CYP2D6 is known to be involved with formation of 4-hydroxy-amfetamine.
Elimination
Following the oral administration of a 70 mg dose of radiolabelled lisdexamfetamine dimesylate to 6 healthy subjects, approximately 96% of the oral dose radioactivity was recovered in the urine and only 0.3% recovered in the faeces over a period of 120 hours. Of the radioactivity recovered in the urine 42% of the dose was related to amfetamine, 25% to hippuric acid, and 2% intact lisdexamfetamine. Plasma concentrations of unconverted lisdexamfetamine are low and transient, generally becoming non-quantifiable by 8 hours after administration. The plasma elimination half-life of lisdexamfetamine typically averaged less than one hour in studies of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in volunteers. The half-life of dexamfetamine is 11 hours.
Special populations
The pharmacokinetics of dexamfetamine, as evaluated by clearance, is similar in children (aged 6 to 12) and adolescents (aged 13 to 17) ADHD patients, and healthy adult volunteers after correcting for body weight.
Systemic exposure to dexamfetamine is similar for men and women given the same mg/kg dose.
Formal pharmacokinetic studies for race have not been conducted. There is no evidence of any impact of ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics of Venvanse.
In a pharmacokinetic study of 40 subjects (8 subjects in each of five renal functional groups: normal, mild impairment, moderate impairment, severe impairment, and end stage renal disease) dexamfetamine clearance was reduced from 0.7 L/hr/kg in normal subjects to 0.4 L/hr/kg in subjects with severe renal impairment (GFR 15 to < 30 mL/min1.73m2 or CrCl <30 mL/min).
In a study of 47 subjects aged 55 years of age or older amfetamine clearance was approximately 0.7 L/hr/kg for subjects 55 to 74 years of age and 0.55 L/hr/kg for subjects >75 years of age. This is slightly reduced compared to younger adults (approximately 1 L/hr/kg for subjects 18 to 45 years of age).
Abuse and dependence
Stimulants including Venvanse have a potential for abuse, misuse, dependence, or diversion for non-therapeutic uses that physicians should consider when prescribing this product. Stimulants should be prescribed cautiously to patients with a history of substance abuse or dependence.
Tolerance, extreme psychological dependence, and severe social disability have occurred with the abuse of stimulants. There are reports of patients who have increased the dosage of amfetamine to levels many times higher than recommended; abrupt cessation following prolonged high dosage administration results in extreme fatigue and mental depression. Changes are also noted on the sleep EEG. Manifestations of chronic intoxication with amfetamines may include severe dermatoses, marked insomnia, irritability, hyperactivity, and personality changes. The most severe manifestation of chronic intoxication is psychosis, often clinically indistinguishable from schizophrenia.
Cardiovascular adverse events
Sudden death in patients with pre-existing structural cardiac abnormalities or other serious heart problems
Children and adolescents: Sudden death has been reported in children and adolescents taking CNS stimulants, including those with structural cardiac abnormalities or other serious heart problems. Although some serious heart problems alone carry an increased risk of sudden death, stimulant products generally should not be used in children or adolescents with known serious structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, serious heart rhythm abnormalities, or other serious cardiac problems that may place them at increased vulnerability to the sympathomimetic effects of a stimulant drug.
Adults: Sudden deaths, stroke, and myocardial infarction have been reported in adults taking stimulant drugs at usual doses for ADHD. Although the role of stimulants in these adult cases is also unknown, adults have a greater likelihood than children of having serious structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, serious heart rhythm abnormalities, coronary artery disease, or other serious cardiac problems. Adults with such abnormalities should also generally not be treated with stimulant drugs.
Hypertension and other cardiovascular conditions
Stimulant medications cause a modest increase in average blood pressure (about 2-4 mmHg) and average heart rate (about 3-6 bpm), and individuals may have larger increases. While the mean changes alone would not be expected to have short-term consequences, all patients should be monitored for larger changes in heart rate and blood pressure. Caution is indicated in treating patients whose underlying medical conditions might be compromised by increases in blood pressure or heart rate, e.g., those with pre-existing hypertension, heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmia.
The use of Venvanse is contraindicated in patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease and also in those patients with moderate to severe hypertension.
Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy has been reported with chronic amfetamine use. It has also been reported with Venvanse.
Assessing cardiovascular status in patients being treated with stimulant medications
All patients who are being considered for treatment with stimulant medications should have a careful history (including assessment for a family history of sudden death or ventricular arrhythmia) and physical exam to assess for the presence of cardiac disease, and should receive further cardiac evaluation if findings suggest such disease (e.g., electrocardiogram or echocardiogram). Patients who develop symptoms such as exertional chest pain, unexplained syncope, or other symptoms suggestive of cardiac disease during stimulant treatment should undergo a prompt cardiac evaluation.
Psychiatric adverse events
Pre-existing psychosis
Administration of stimulants may exacerbate symptoms of behaviour disturbance and thought disorder in patients with pre-existing psychotic disorders.
Bipolar illness
Particular care should be taken in using stimulants to treat ADHD patients with comorbid bipolar disorder because of concern for possible induction of mixed/manic episode in such patients. Prior to initiating treatment with a stimulant, patients with comorbid depressive symptoms should be adequately screened to determine if they are at risk for bipolar disorder; such screening should include a detailed psychiatric history, including a family history of suicide, bipolar disorder, and depression.
Emergence of new psychotic or manic symptoms
Treatment emergent psychotic or manic symptoms, e.g., hallucinations, delusional thinking, or mania in children and adolescents without prior history of psychotic illness or mania can be caused by stimulants at usual doses. If such symptoms occur, consideration should be given to a possible causal role of the stimulant, and discontinuation of treatment may be appropriate.
Aggression
Aggressive behaviour or hostility is often observed in children and adolescents with ADHD, and has been reported in clinical trials and the postmarketing experience of some medications indicated for the treatment of ADHD including Venvanse. Stimulants may cause aggressive behaviour or hostility. Patients beginning treatment for ADHD should be monitored for the appearance of or worsening of aggressive behaviour or hostility.
Tics
Stimulants have been reported to exacerbate motor and phonic tics and Tourette's syndrome. Therefore, clinical evaluation for tics and Tourette's syndrome in children and their families should precede use of stimulant medications.
Long-term suppression of growth (height and weight)
Stimulants have been associated with a slowing of weight gain and a reduction in attained height. Growth should be monitored during treatment with stimulants, and patients who are not growing or gaining weight as expected may need to have their treatment interrupted. Height, weight, and appetite should be recorded at least 6-monthly.
In a controlled study of patients aged 6 to 17 years the mean (SD) changes in body weight after seven weeks were -2.35 (2.084) kg for Venvanse, +0.87 (1.102) kg for placebo, and -1.36 (1.552) kg for methylphenidate hydrochloride.
Seizures
There is some clinical evidence that stimulants may lower the convulsive threshold in patients with prior history of seizure, in patients with prior EEG abnormalities in absence of seizures, and very rarely, in patients without a history of seizures and no prior EEG evidence of seizures. In the presence of new onset or worsening seizures, the drug should be discontinued.
Visual disturbance
Difficulties with accommodation and blurring of vision have been reported with stimulant treatment.
Prescribing and dispensing
The least amount of Venvanse feasible should be prescribed or dispensed in order to minimise the risk of possible overdose by the patient.
Use with other sympathomimetic drugs
Venvanse should be used with caution in patients who use other sympathomimetic drugs.
Use in adults
Safety and efficacy have not been established for the routine continuation of treatment beyond 18 years of age. If treatment withdrawal has not been successful when an adolescent has reached 18 years of age continued treatment into adulthood may be necessary. The need for further treatment of these adults should be reviewed regularly and undertaken annually.
Venvanse can cause dizziness, drowsiness and visual disturbances including difficulties with accommodation, diplopia and blurred vision. These could have a moderate influence on the ability to drive and use machines. Patients should be warned of these possible effects and advised that if affected, they should avoid potentially hazardous activities such as driving or operating machinery.
This medicine can impair cognitive function and can affect a patient's ability to drive safely. This class of medicine is in the list of drugs included in regulations under 5a of the Road Traffic Act 1988. When prescribing this medicine, patients should be told:
- The medicine is likely to affect your ability to drive.
- Do not drive until you know how the medicine affects you.
- It is an offence to drive while under the influence of this medicine.
- However, you would not be committing an offence (called 'statutory defence') if:
o The medicine has been prescribed to treat a medical problem and
o You have taken it according to the instructions given by the prescriber and in the information provided with the medicine and
o It was not affecting your ability to drive safely.
Treatment must be initiated under the supervision of an appropriate specialist in childhood and/or adolescent behavioural disorders.
Posology
Dosage should be individualised according to the therapeutic needs and response of the patient. Careful dose titration is necessary at the start of treatment with Venvanse.
The starting dose is 30 mg taken once daily in the morning. When in the judgment of the clinician a lower initial dose is appropriate, patients may begin treatment with 20 mg once daily in the morning.
The dose may be increased by 10 or 20 mg increments, at approximately weekly intervals. Venvanse should be administered orally at the lowest effective dosage.
The maximum recommended dose is 70 mg/day; higher doses have not been studied.
Treatment must be stopped if the symptoms do not improve after appropriate dosage adjustment over a 1-month period. If paradoxical aggravation of symptoms or other intolerable adverse events occur, the dosage should be reduced or discontinued.
Method of administration
Venvanse may be taken with or without food.
Venvanse may be swallowed whole, or the capsule opened and the entire contents emptied and mixed with a soft food such as yogurt or in a glass of water or orange juice. If the contents include any compacted powder, a spoon may be used to break apart the powder in the soft food or liquid. The contents should be stirred until completely dispersed. The patient should consume the entire mixture of soft food or liquid immediately; it should not be stored. The active ingredient dissolves completely once dispersed; however, a film containing the inactive ingredients may remain in the glass or container once the mixture is consumed.
The patient should not take anything less than one capsule per day and a single capsule should not be divided.
In the event of a missed dose, Venvanse dosing can resume the next day. Afternoon doses should be avoided because of the potential for insomnia.
Pre-treatment evaluation
Prior to prescribing, it is necessary to conduct a baseline evaluation of a patient's cardiovascular status including blood pressure and heart rate. A comprehensive history should document concomitant medications, past and present co-morbid medical and psychiatric disorders or symptoms, family history of sudden cardiac/unexplained death, and accurate recording of pre-treatment height and weight on a growth chart.
Consistent with other stimulants, the potential for abuse, misuse or diversion of Venvanse should be considered prior to prescribing.
Ongoing monitoring
- Blood pressure and pulse should be recorded on a centile chart at each adjustment of dose and at least every six months.
- Height, weight, and appetite should be recorded at least six-monthly with maintenance of a growth chart.
- Development of de novo or worsening of pre-existing psychiatric disorders should be monitored at every adjustment of dose and then at least every six months and at every visit.
Patients should be monitored for the risk of diversion, misuse, and abuse of Venvanse.
Long-term use
Pharmacological treatment of ADHD may be needed for extended periods. The physician who elects to use Venvanse for extended periods (over 12 months) should re-evaluate the usefulness of Venvanse at least yearly, and consider trial periods off medication to assess the patient's functioning without pharmacotherapy, preferably during times of school holidays.
Adults
In adolescents whose symptoms persist into adulthood and who have shown clear benefit from treatment, it may be appropriate to continue treatment into adulthood.
Children Under 6 years
Venvanse should not be used in children under the age of 6 years. Safety and efficacy in this age group has not been established.
Elderly
Dexamfetamine clearance is reduced in the elderly so dose adjustment may be required.
Patients with renal impairment
Due to reduced clearance in patients with severe renal insufficiency (GFR 15 to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or CrCl <30 mL/min ) the maximum dose should not exceed 50 mg/day. Further dosage reduction should be considered in patients undergoing dialysis. Lisdexamfetamine and dexamfetamine are not dialysable.
Patients with hepatic impairment
No studies have been conducted in patients with hepatic impairment.
Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.
