джакави

Overdose

There is no known antidote for overdoses with Джакави. Single doses up to 200 mg have been given with acceptable acute tolerability. Higher than recommended repeat doses are associated with increased myelosuppression including leukopenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Appropriate supportive treatment should be given.

Haemodialysis is not expected to enhance the elimination of ruxolitinib.

Contraindications

Pregnancy and lactation.

Incompatibilities

Not applicable.

Pharmaceutical form

Undesirable effects

Summary of the safety profile

The safety assessment was based on a total of 982 patients (with MF or PV) receiving Джакави in phase 2 and 3 studies.

Myelofibrosis

In the randomised period of the two pivotal studies, COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, the median duration of exposure to Джакави was 10.8 months (range 0.3 to 23.5 months). The majority of patients (68.4%) were treated for at least 9 months. Of 301 patients, 111 (36.9%) had a baseline platelet count of between 100,000/mm3 and 200,000/mm3 and 190 (63.1%) had a baseline platelet count of >200,000/mm3.

In these clinical studies, discontinuation due to adverse events, regardless of causality, was observed in 11.3% of patients.

The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions were thrombocytopenia and anaemia.

Haematological adverse drug reactions (any Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade) included anaemia (82.4%), thrombocytopenia (69.8%) and neutropenia (16.6%).

Anaemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia are dose-related effects.

The three most frequent non-haematological adverse drug reactions were bruising (21.3%), dizziness (15.3%) and headache (14.0%).

The three most frequent non-haematological laboratory abnormalities were raised alanine aminotransferase (27.2%), raised aspartate aminotransferase (19.9%) and hypercholesterolaemia (16.9%). In phase 3 clinical studies in MF, neither CTCAE grade 3 or 4 hypercholesterolaemia, raised aspartate aminotransferase nor CTCAE grade 4 raised alanine aminotransferase were observed.

Long-term safety:

Long term safety data from two pivotal phase 3 studies assessed 457 patients with MF who were treated with ruxolitinib, including patients initially randomised to ruxolitinib (n=301; exposure 0.3-68.1 months, median exposure 33.4 months) and patients who received ruxolitinib after crossing over from control treatments (n=156; exposure: 0.5-59.8 months, median exposure 25.0 months). The cumulative frequency of adverse events in these studies increased proportionally to the increase in the follow-up time. With these updated data, therapy discontinuation due to adverse events was observed in 27.4% of patients treated with ruxolitinib.

Polycythaemia vera

The safety of Джакави was assessed in 184 patients with PV in two open-label, randomised, controlled studies, the phase 3 RESPONSE study and the phase 3b RESPONSE 2 study. The adverse drug reactions listed below reflect the randomised study period (up to week 32 for RESPONSE and up to week 28 for RESPONSE 2) with equivalent exposure to ruxolitinib and Best Available Therapy (BAT). The median duration of exposure to Джакави during the randomised study periods was 7.85 months (range 0.03 to 7.85 months).

Discontinuation due to adverse events, regardless of causality, was observed in 2.2% of patients.

Haematological adverse reactions (any CTCAE grade) included anaemia (40.8%) and thrombocytopenia (16.8%). Anaemia or thrombocytopenia CTCAE grade 3 and 4 were reported in respectively 1.1% or 3.3%.

The three most frequent non-haematological adverse reactions were dizziness (9.2%), constipation (8.7%) and hypertension (6.5%).

The three most frequent non-haematological laboratory abnormalities (any CTCAE grade) identified as adverse reactions were raised aspartate aminotransferase (26.1%), raised alanine aminotransferase (22.3%) and hypercholesterolaemia (20.7%). These were all CTCAE grade 1 and 2 with the exception of one CTCAE grade 3 raised alanine aminotransferase event.

Long-term safety was evaluated using data from two phase 3 studies including data from patients initially randomised to ruxolitinib (n=184; exposure 0.03 to 43.5 months, median exposure 18.9 months) and patients who received ruxolitinib after crossing over from control treatments (n=149; exposure: 0.2 to 33.5 months, median exposure 12.0 months): With longer exposure, the cumulative frequency of adverse events increased but no new safety findings emerged. When adjusted for exposure, the adverse events rates were generally comparable with those observed during the comparative periods of the randomised studies.

Tabulated list of adverse drug reactions from clinical studies

In the clinical study programme the severity of adverse drug reactions was assessed based on the CTCAE, defining grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe and grade 4=life-threatening.

Adverse drug reactions from clinical studies (Table 1) are listed by MedDRA system organ class. Within each system organ class, the adverse drug reactions are ranked by frequency, with the most frequent reactions first. In addition, the corresponding frequency category for each adverse drug reaction is based on the following convention: very common (>1/10); common (>1/100 to <1/10); uncommon (>1/1,000 to <1/100); rare (>1/10,000 to <1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000).

Table 1 Frequency category of adverse drug reactions reported in the phase 3 studies (COMFORT-I, COMFORT-II, RESPONSE, RESPONSE 2)

Upon discontinuation, MF patients may experience a return of MF symptoms such as fatigue, bone pain, fever, pruritus, night sweats, symptomatic splenomegaly and weight loss. In clinical studies in MF the total symptom score for MF symptoms gradually returned to baseline value within 7 days after dose discontinuation.

Description of selected adverse drug reactions

Anaemia

In phase 3 clinical studies in MF, median time to onset of first CTCAE grade 2 or higher anaemia was 1.5 months. One patient (0.3%) discontinued treatment because of anaemia.

In patients receiving ruxolitinib mean decreases in haemoglobin reached a nadir of approximately 10 g/litre below baseline after 8 to 12 weeks of therapy and then gradually recovered to reach a new steady state that was approximately 5 g/litre below baseline. This pattern was observed in patients regardless of whether they had received transfusion during therapy.

In the randomised, placebo-controlled study COMFORT-I 60.6% of Джакави-treated MF patients and 37.7% of placebo-treated MF patients received red blood cell transfusions during randomised treatment. In the COMFORT-II study the rate of packed red blood cell transfusions was 53.4% in the Джакави arm and 41.1% in the best available therapy arm.

In the randomised period of the pivotal studies, anaemia was less frequent in PV patients than in MF patients (40.8% versus 82.4%). In the PV population, the CTCAE grade 3 and 4 events were reported in 2.7%, while in the MF patients the frequency was 42.56%.

Thrombocytopenia

In the phase 3 clinical studies in MF, in patients who developed grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, the median time to onset was approximately 8 weeks. Thrombocytopenia was generally reversible with dose reduction or dose interruption. The median time to recovery of platelet counts above 50,000/mm3 was 14 days. During the randomised period, platelet transfusions were administered to 4.7% of patients receiving ruxolitinib and to 4.0% of patients receiving control regimens. Discontinuation of treatment because of thrombocytopenia occurred in 0.7% of patients receiving ruxolitinib and 0.9% of patients receiving control regimens. Patients with a platelet count of 100,000/mm3 to 200,000/mm3 before starting ruxolitinib had a higher frequency of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia compared to patients with platelet count >200,000/mm3 (64.2% versus 38.5%).

In the randomised period of the pivotal studies, the rate of patients experiencing thrombocytopenia was lower in PV (16.8%) patients compared to MF (69.8%) patients. The frequency of severe (i.e. CTCAE grade 3 and 4) thrombocytopenia was lower in PV (2.7%) than in MF (11.6%) patients.

Neutropenia

In the phase 3 clinical studies in MF, in patients who developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, the median time to onset was 12 weeks. During the randomised period, dose holding or reductions due to neutropenia were reported in 1.0% of patients, and 0.3% of patients discontinued treatment because of neutropenia.

In the randomised period of the pivotal study in PV patients, neutropenia was reported in three patients (1.6%) of which one patient developed CTCAE grade 4 neutropenia.

Bleeding

In the phase 3 pivotal studies in MF bleeding events (including intracranial and gastrointestinal, bruising and other bleeding events) were reported in 32.6% of patients exposed to ruxolitinib and 23.2% of patients exposed to the reference treatments (placebo or best available therapy). The frequency of grade 3-4 events was similar for patients treated with ruxolitinib or reference treatments (4.7% versus 3.1%). Most of the patients with bleeding events during the treatment reported bruising (65.3%). Bruising events were more frequently reported in patients taking ruxolitinib compared with the reference treatments (21.3% versus 11.6%). Intracranial bleeding was reported in 1% of patients exposed to ruxolitinib and 0.9% exposed to reference treatments. Gastrointestinal bleeding was reported in 5.0% of patients exposed to ruxolitinib compared to 3.1% exposed to reference treatments. Other bleeding events (including events such as epistaxis, post-procedural haemorrhage and haematuria) were reported in 13.3% of patients treated with ruxolitinib and 10.3% treated with reference treatments.

In the comparative period of phase 3 studies in PV patients, bleeding events (including intracranial and gastrointestinal, bruising and other bleeding events) were reported in 16.8% of patients treated with ruxolitinib, 15.3% of patients receiving best available therapy in RESPONSE study and 12.0% of patients receiving best available therapy in RESPONSE 2 study. Bruising was reported in 10.3% of patients treated with ruxolitinib, 8.1% of patients receiving best available therapy in RESPONSE study and 2.7% of patients receiving best available therapy in RESPONSE 2 study. No intracranial bleeding or gastrointestinal haemorrhage events were reported in patients receiving ruxolitinib. One patient treated with ruxolitinib experienced a grade 3 bleeding event (post-procedural bleeding); no grade 4 bleeding was reported. Other bleeding events (including events such as epistaxis, post-procedural haemorrhage, gingival bleeding) were reported in 8.7% of patients treated with ruxolitinib, 6.3% of patients treated with best available therapy in RESPONSE study and 6.7% of patients treated with best available therapy in RESPONSE 2 study.

Infections

In the phase 3 pivotal studies in MF, grade 3 or 4 urinary tract infection was reported in 1.0% of patients, herpes zoster in 4.3% and tuberculosis in 1.0%. In phase 3 clinical studies sepsis was reported in 3.0% of patients. An extended follow-up of patients treated with ruxolitinib showed no trends towards an increase in the rate of sepsis over time.

In the randomised period of the pivotal study in PV patients, one (0.5%) CTCAE grade 3 and no grade 4 urinary tract infection was reported. The rate of herpes zoster was similar in PV (4.3%) patients and MF (4.0%) patients. There was one report of CTCAE grade 3 post-herpetic neuralgia amongst the PV patients.

Increased systolic blood pressure

In the phase 3 pivotal clinical studies in MF an increase in systolic blood pressure of 20 mmHg or more from baseline was recorded in 31.5% of patients on at least one visit compared with 19.5% of the control-treated patients. In COMFORT-I (MF patients) the mean increase from baseline in systolic BP was 0-2 mmHg on ruxolitinib versus a decrease of 2-5 mmHg in the placebo arm. In COMFORT-II mean values showed little difference between the ruxolitinib-treated and the control-treated MF patients.

In the randomised period of the pivotal study in PV patients, the mean systolic blood pressure increased by 0.65 mmHg in the ruxolitinib arm versus a decrease of 2 mmHg in the BAT arm.

Reporting of suspected adverse reactions

Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme at: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App Store.

Preclinical safety data

Ruxolitinib has been evaluated in safety pharmacology, repeated dose toxicity, genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity studies and in a carcinogenicity study. Target organs associated with the pharmacological action of ruxolitinib in repeated dose studies include bone marrow, peripheral blood and lymphoid tissues. Infections generally associated with immunosuppression were noted in dogs. Adverse decreases in blood pressure along with increases in heart rate were noted in a dog telemetry study, and an adverse decrease in minute volume was noted in a respiratory study in rats. The margins (based on unbound Cmax) at the non-adverse level in the dog and rat studies were 15.7-fold and 10.4-fold greater, respectively, than the maximum human recommended dose of 25 mg twice daily. No effects were noted in an evaluation of the neuropharmacological effects of ruxolitinib.

Ruxolitinib decreased foetal weight and increased post-implantation loss in animal studies. There was no evidence of a teratogenic effect in rats and rabbits. However, the exposure margins compared to the highest clinical dose were low and the results are therefore of limited relevance for humans. No effects were noted on fertility. In a pre- and post-natal development study, a slightly prolonged gestation period, reduced number of implantation sites, and reduced number of pups delivered were observed. In the pups, decreased mean initial body weights and short period of decreased mean body weight gain were observed. In lactating rats, ruxolitinib and/or its metabolites were excreted into the milk with a concentration that was 13-fold higher than the maternal plasma concentration. Ruxolitinib was not mutagenic or clastogenic. Ruxolitinib was not carcinogenic in the Tg.rasH2 transgenic mouse model.

Therapeutic indications

Myelofibrosis (MF)

Джакави is indicated for the treatment of disease-related splenomegaly or symptoms in adult patients with primary myelofibrosis (also known as chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis), post polycythaemia vera myelofibrosis or post essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis.

Polycythaemia vera (PV)

Джакави is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with polycythaemia vera who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea.

Pharmacotherapeutic group

Pharmacodynamic properties

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, protein kinase inhibitors, ATC code: L01XE18

Mechanism of action

Ruxolitinib is a selective inhibitor of the Janus Associated Kinases (JAKs) JAK1 and JAK2 (IC50 values of 3.3 nM and 2.8 nM for JAK1 and JAK2 enzymes, respectively). These mediate the signalling of a number of cytokines and growth factors that are important for haematopoiesis and immune function.

MF and PV are myeloproliferative neoplasms known to be associated with dysregulated JAK1 and JAK2 signalling. The basis for the dysregulation is believed to include high levels of circulating cytokines that activate the JAK-STAT pathway, gain-of-function mutations such as JAK2V617F, and silencing of negative regulatory mechanisms. MF patients exhibit dysregulated JAK signalling regardless of JAK2V617F mutation status. Activating mutations in JAK2 (V617F or exon 12) are found in >95% of PV patients.

Ruxolitinib inhibits JAK-STAT signalling and cell proliferation of cytokine-dependent cellular models of haematological malignancies, as well as of Ba/F3 cells rendered cytokine-independent by expressing the JAK2V617F mutated protein, with IC50 ranging from 80-320 nM.

Pharmacodynamic effects

Ruxolitinib inhibits cytokine-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in whole blood from healthy subjects, MF patients and PV patients. Ruxolitinib resulted in maximal inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation 2 hours after dosing which returned to near baseline by 8 hours in both healthy subjects and MF patients, indicating no accumulation of either parent or active metabolites.

Baseline elevations in inflammatory markers associated with constitutional symptoms such as TNFα, IL-6 and CRP in subjects with MF were decreased following treatment with ruxolitinib. MF patients did not become refractory to the pharmacodynamic effects of ruxolitinib treatment over time. Similarly, patients with PV also presented with baseline elevations in inflammatory markers and these markers were decreased following treatment with ruxolitinib.

In a thorough QT study in healthy subjects, there was no indication of a QT/QTc prolonging effect of ruxolitinib in single doses up to a supratherapeutic dose of 200 mg, indicating that ruxolitinib has no effect on cardiac repolarisation.

Clinical efficacy and safety

Myelofibrosis

Two randomised phase 3 studies (COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II) were conducted in patients with MF (primary MF, post-polycythaemia vera MF or post-essential thrombocythaemia MF). In both studies, patients had palpable splenomegaly at least 5 cm below the costal margin and risk category of intermediate-2 or high risk based on the International Working Group (IWG) Consensus Criteria. The starting dose of Джакави was based on platelet count.

COMFORT-I was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study in 309 patients who were refractory to or were not candidates for available therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of subjects achieving >35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at week 24 as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT).

Secondary endpoints included duration of maintenance of a >35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume, proportion of patients who had >50% reduction in total symptom score, changes in total symptom scores from baseline to week 24, as measured by the modified MF Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 diary, and overall survival.

COMFORT-II was an open-label, randomised study in 219 patients. Patients were randomised 2:1 to ruxolitinib versus best available therapy. In the best available therapy arm, 47% of patients received hydroxyurea and 16% of patients received glucocorticoids. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients achieving >35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at week 48 as measured by MRI or CT.

Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients achieving a >35% reduction of spleen volume from baseline at week 24 and duration of maintenance of a >35% reduction from baseline spleen volume.

In COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, patient baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between the treatment arms.

Table 2 Percentage of patients with >35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at week 24 in COMFORT-I and at week 48 in COMFORT-II (ITT)

A significantly higher proportion of patients in the Джакави group achieved >35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume (Table 2) regardless of the presence or absence of the JAK2V617F mutation or the disease subtype (primary MF, post-polycythaemia vera MF, post-essential thrombocythaemia MF).

Table 3 Percentage of patients with >35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume by JAK mutation status (safety set)

The probability of maintaining spleen response (>35% reduction) on Джакави for at least 24 weeks was 89% in COMFORT-I and 87% in COMFORT-II; 52% maintained spleen responses for at least 48 weeks in COMFORT-II.

In COMFORT-I, 45.9% subjects in the Джакави group achieved a >50% improvement from baseline in the week 24 total symptom score (measured using MFSAF diary v2.0), as compared to 5.3% in the placebo group (p<0.0001 using chi-square test). The mean change in the global health status at week 24, as measured by EORTC QLQ C30 was +12.3 for Джакави and -3.4 for placebo (p<0.0001).

In COMFORT-I, after a median follow-up of 34.3 months, the death rate in patients randomised to the ruxolitinib arm was 27.1% versus 35.1% in patients randomised to placebo; HR 0.687; 95% CI 0.459-1.029; p=0.0668.

In COMFORT-I, after a median follow-up of 61.7 months, the death rate in patients randomised to the ruxolitinib arm was 44.5% (69 of 155 patients) versus 53.2% (82 of 154) in patients randomised to placebo. There was a 31% reduction in the risk of death in the ruxolitinib arm as compared to placebo (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.96; p=0.025).

In COMFORT-II, after a median follow-up of 34.7 months, the death rate in patients randomised to ruxolitinib was 19.9% versus 30.1% in patients randomised to best available treatment (BAT); HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.28-0.85; p=0.009. In both studies, the lower death rates noted in the ruxolitinib arm were predominantly driven by the results obtained in the post polycythaemia vera and post essential thrombocythaemia subgroups.

In COMFORT-II, after a median follow-up of 55.9 months, the death rate in patients randomised to the ruxolitinib arm was 40.4% (59 of 146 patients) versus 47.9% (35 of 73 patients) in patients randomized to best available therapy (BAT). There was a 33% reduction in risk of death in the ruxolitinib arm compared to the BAT arm (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.44-1.02; p=0.062).

Polycythaemia vera

A randomised, open-label, active-controlled phase 3 study (RESPONSE) was conducted in 222 patients with PV who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea defined based on the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) international working group published criteria. 110 patients were randomised to the ruxolitinib arm and 112 patients to the BAT arm. The starting dose of Джакави was 10 mg twice daily. Doses were then adjusted in individual patients based on tolerability and efficacy with a maximum dose of 25 mg twice daily. BAT was selected by the investigator on a patient-by-patient basis and included hydroxyurea (59.5%), interferon/pegylated interferon (11.7%), anagrelide (7.2%), pipobroman (1.8%) and observation (15.3%).

Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between the two treatments arms. The median age was 60 years (range 33 to 90 years). Patients in the ruxolitinib arm had PV diagnosis for a median of 8.2 years and had previously received hydroxyurea for a median of approximately 3 years. Most patients (>80%) had received at least two phlebotomies in the last 24 weeks prior to screening. Comparative data regarding long-term survival and incidence of disease complications is missing.

The primary composite endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving both an absence of phlebotomy eligibility (HCT control) and a >35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline at week 32. Phlebotomy eligibility was defined as a confirmed HCT of >45%, i.e. at least 3 percentage points higher than the HCT obtained at baseline or a confirmed HCT of >48%, depending on which was lower. Key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved the primary endpoint and remained free from progression at week 48, as well as the proportion of patients achieving complete haematological remission at week 32.

The study met its primary objective and a higher proportion of patients in the Джакави group achieved the primary composite endpoint and each of its individual components. Significantly more patients treated with Джакави (23%) achieved a primary response (p<0.0001) compared to BAT (0.9%). Haematocrit control was achieved in 60% of patients in the Джакави arm compared to 18.8% in the BAT arm and a >35% reduction in spleen volume was achieved in 40% of patients in the Джакави arm compared to 0.9% in the BAT arm (Figure 1).

Both key secondary endpoints were also met. The proportion of patients achieving a complete haematological remission was 23.6% on Джакави compared to 8.0% on BAT (p=0.0013) and the proportion of patients achieving a durable primary response at week 48 was 20% on Джакави and 0.9% on BAT (p<0.0001).

Figure 1 Patients achieving the primary endpoint and components of the primary endpoint at week 32

Symptom burden was assessed using the MPN-SAF total symptom score (TSS) electronic patient diary, which consisted of 14 questions. At week 32, 49% and 64% of patients treated with ruxolitinib achieved a >50% reduction in TSS-14 and TSS-5, respectively, compared to only 5% and 11% of patients on BAT.

Treatment benefit perception was measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire. 66% of patients treated with ruxolitinib compared to 19% treated with BAT reported an improvement as early as four weeks after beginning treatment. Improvement in perception of treatment benefit was also higher in patients treated with ruxolitinib at week 32 (78% versus 33%).

Additional analyses from the RESPONSE study to assess durability of response were conducted at week 80 only in the Джакави arm. In this arm, 83% of patients were still on treatment at the time of the week 80 data cut-off. Of patients who achieved a primary response at week 32, 80% maintained their response for at least 48 weeks after the initial response.

A second randomised, open label, active-controlled phase 3b study (RESPONSE 2) was conducted in 149 PV patients who were resistant to, or intolerant of, hydroxyurea but without palpable splenomegaly. The primary endpoint defined as the proportion of patients achieving HCT control (absence of phlebotomy eligibility) at week 28 was met (62.2% in the Джакави arm versus 18.7% in the BAT arm). The key secondary endpoint defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete haematological remission at week 28 was also met (23.0% in the Джакави arm versus 5.3% in the BAT arm).

Paediatric population

Pharmacokinetic properties

Absorption

Ruxolitinib is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) class 1 compound, with high permeability, high solubility and rapid dissolution characteristics. In clinical studies, ruxolitinib is rapidly absorbed after oral administration with maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) achieved approximately 1 hour post-dose. Based on a human mass balance study, oral absorption of ruxolitinib, as ruxolitinib or metabolites formed under first-pass, is 95% or greater. Mean ruxolitinib Cmax and total exposure (AUC) increased proportionally over a single dose range of 5-200 mg. There was no clinically relevant change in the pharmacokinetics of ruxolitinib upon administration with a high-fat meal. The mean Cmax was moderately decreased (24%) while the mean AUC was nearly unchanged (4% increase) on dosing with a high-fat meal.

Distribution

The mean volume of distribution at steady state is approximately 75 litres in MF and PV patients. At clinically relevant concentrations of ruxolitinib, binding to plasma proteins in vitro is approximately 97%, mostly to albumin. A whole body autoradiography study in rats has shown that ruxolitinib does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier.

Biotransformation

Ruxolitinib is mainly metabolised by CYP3A4 (>50%), with additional contribution from CYP2C9. Parent compound is the predominant entity in human plasma, representing approximately 60% of the drug-related material in circulation. Two major and active metabolites are present in plasma representing 25% and 11% of parent AUC. These metabolites have one half to one fifth of the parent JAK-related pharmacological activity. The sum total of all active metabolites contributes to 18% of the overall pharmacodynamics of ruxolitinib. At clinically relevant concentrations, ruxolitinib does not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 and is not a potent inducer of CYP1A2, CYP2B6 or CYP3A4 based on in vitro studies. In vitro data indicate that ruxolitinib may inhibit P-gp and BCRP.

Elimination

Ruxolitinib is mainly eliminated through metabolism. The mean elimination half-life of ruxolitinib is approximately 3 hours. Following a single oral dose of [14C]-labelled ruxolitinib in healthy adult subjects, elimination was predominately through metabolism, with 74% of radioactivity excreted in urine and 22% via faeces. Unchanged parent substance accounted for less than 1% of the excreted total radioactivity.

Linearity/non-linearity

Dose proportionality was demonstrated in the single and multiple dose studies.

Special populations

Effects of age, gender or race

Based on studies in healthy subjects, no relevant differences in ruxolitinib pharmacokinetics were observed with regard to gender and race. In a population pharmacokinetic evaluation in MF patients, no relationship was apparent between oral clearance and patient age or race. The predicted oral clearance was 17.7 l/h in women and 22.1 l/h in men, with 39% inter-subject variability in MF patients. Clearance was 12.7 l/h in PV patients, with a 42% inter-subject variability and no relationship was apparent between oral clearance and gender, patient age or race, based on a population pharmacokinetic evaluation in PV patients.

Paediatric population

Renal impairment

Renal function was determined using both Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and urinary creatinine. Following a single ruxolitinib dose of 25 mg, the exposure of ruxolitinib was similar in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment and in those with normal renal function. However, plasma AUC values of ruxolitinib metabolites tended to increase with increasing severity of renal impairment, and were most markedly increased in the subjects with severe renal impairment. It is unknown whether the increased metabolite exposure is of safety concern. A dose modification is recommended in patients with severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease. Dosing only on dialysis days reduces the metabolite exposure, but also the pharmacodynamic effect, especially on the days between dialysis.

Hepatic impairment

Following a single ruxolitinib dose of 25 mg in patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment, the mean AUC for ruxolitinib was increased in patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment by 87%, 28% and 65%, respectively, compared to patients with normal hepatic function. There was no clear relationship between AUC and the degree of hepatic impairment based on Child-Pugh scores. The terminal elimination half-life was prolonged in patients with hepatic impairment compared to healthy controls (4.1-5.0 hours versus 2.8 hours). A dose reduction of approximately 50% is recommended for patients with hepatic impairment.

Name of the medicinal product

Qualitative and quantitative composition

Special warnings and precautions for use

Myelosuppression

Treatment with Джакави can cause haematological adverse drug reactions, including thrombocytopenia, anaemia and neutropenia. A complete blood count, including a white blood cell count differential, must be performed before initiating therapy with Джакави. Treatment should be discontinued in patients with platelet count less than 50,000/mm3 or absoute neutrophil count less than 500/mm3.

It has been observed that patients with low platelet counts (<200,000/mm3) at the start of therapy are more likely to develop thrombocytopenia during treatment.

Thrombocytopenia is generally reversible and is usually managed by reducing the dose or temporarily withholding Джакави. However, platelet transfusions may be required as clinically indicated.

Patients developing anaemia may require blood transfusions. Dose modifications or interruption for patients developing anaemia may also be considered.

Patients with a haemoglobin level below 10.0 g/dl at the beginning of the treatment have a higher risk of developing a haemoglobin level below 8.0 g/dl during treatment compared to patients with a higher baseline haemoglobin level (79.3% versus 30.1%). More frequent monitoring of haematology parameters and of clinical signs and symptoms of Джакави-related adverse drug reactions is recommended for patients with baseline haemoglobin below 10.0 g/dl.

Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <500) was generally reversible and was managed by temporarily withholding Джакави.

Complete blood counts should be monitored as clinically indicated and dose adjusted as required.

Infections

Serious bacterial, mycobacterial, fungal, viral and other opportunistic infections have occurred in patients treated with Джакави. Patients should be assessed for the risk of developing serious infections. Physicians should carefully observe patients receiving Джакави for signs and symptoms of infections and initiate appropriate treatment promptly. Treatment with Джакави should not be started until active serious infections have resolved.

Tuberculosis has been reported in patients receiving Джакави. Before starting treatment, patients should be evaluated for active and inactive (“latent”) tuberculosis, as per local recommendations. This can include medical history, possible previous contact with tuberculosis, and/or appropriate screening such as lung x-ray, tuberculin test and/or interferon-gamma release assay, as applicable. Prescribers are reminded of the risk of false negative tuberculin skin test results, especially in patients who are severely ill or immunocompromised.

Hepatitis B viral load (HBV-DNA titre) increases, with and without associated elevations in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, have been reported in patients with chronic HBV infections taking Джакави. The effect of Джакави on viral replication in patients with chronic HBV infection is unknown. Patients with chronic HBV infection should be treated and monitored according to clinical guidelines.

Herpes zoster

Physicians should educate patients about early signs and symptoms of herpes zoster, advising that treatment should be sought as early as possible.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has been reported with Джакави treatment. Physicians should be particularly alert to symptoms suggestive of PML that patients may not notice (e.g., cognitive, neurological or psychiatric symptoms or signs). Patients should be monitored for any of these new or worsening symptoms or signs, and if such symptoms/signs occur, referral to a neurologist and appropriate diagnostic measures for PML should be considered. If PML is suspected, further dosing must be suspended until PML has been excluded.

Non-melanoma skin cancer

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), including basal cell, squamous cell, and Merkel cell carcinoma, have been reported in patients treated with ruxolitinib. Most of these patients had histories of extended treatment with hydroxyurea and prior NMSC or pre-malignant skin lesions. A causal relationship to ruxolitinib has not been established. Periodic skin examination is recommended for patients who are at increased risk for skin cancer.

Lipid abnormalities/elevations

Treatment with Джакави has been associated with increases in lipid parameters including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. Lipid monitoring and treatment of dyslipidaemia according to clinical guidelines is recommended.

Special populations

Renal impairment

The starting dose of Джакави should be reduced in patients with severe renal impairment. For patients with end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis the starting dose for MF patients should be based on platelet counts. Subsequent doses (single dose of 20 mg or two doses of 10 mg given 12 hours apart in MF patients; single dose of 10 mg or two doses of 5 mg given 12 hours apart in PV patients) should be administered only on haemodialysis days following each dialysis session. Additional dose modifications should be made with careful monitoring of safety and efficacy.

Hepatic impairment

The starting dose of Джакави should be reduced by approximately 50% in patients with hepatic impairment. Further dose modifications should be based on the safety and efficacy of the medicinal product.

Interactions

If Джакави is to be co-administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or dual inhibitors of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 enzymes (e.g. fluconazole), the unit dose of Джакави should be reduced by approximately 50%, to be administered twice daily.

The concomitant use of cytoreductive therapies or haematopoietic growth factors with Джакави has not been studied. The safety and efficacy of these co-administrations are not known.

Withdrawal effects

Following interruption or discontinuation of Джакави, symptoms of MF may return over a period of approximately one week. There have been cases of patients discontinuing Джакави who sustained more severe events, particularly in the presence of acute intercurrent illness. It has not been established whether abrupt discontinuation of Джакави contributed to these events. Unless abrupt discontinuation is required, gradual tapering of the dose of Джакави may be considered, although the utility of the tapering is unproven.

Excipients

Джакави contains lactose. Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption should not take this medicinal product.

Effects on ability to drive and use machines

Джакави has no or negligible sedating effect. However, patients who experience dizziness after the intake of Джакави should refrain from driving or using machines.

Dosage (Posology) and method of administration

Джакави treatment should only be initiated by a physician experienced in the administration of anti-cancer medicinal products.

A complete blood cell count, including a white blood cell count differential, must be performed before initiating therapy with Джакави.

Complete blood count, including a white blood cell count differential, should be monitored every 2-4 weeks until Джакави doses are stabilised, and then as clinically indicated.

Posology

Starting dose

The recommended starting dose of ruxolitinib in MF is 15 mg twice daily for patients with a platelet count between 100,000/mm3 and 200,000/mm3 and 20 mg twice daily for patients with a platelet count of >200,000/mm3. The recommended starting dose of ruxolitinib in PV is 10 mg given orally twice daily.

There is limited information to recommend a starting dose for patients with platelet counts between 50,000/mm3 and <100,000/mm3. The maximum recommended starting dose in these patients is 5 mg twice daily and the patients should be titrated cautiously.

Dose modifications

Doses may be titrated based on safety and efficacy. Treatment should be discontinued for platelet counts less than 50,000/mm3 or absolute neutrophil counts less than 500/mm3. In PV, treatment should also be interrupted when haemoglobin is below 8 g/dl. After recovery of blood counts above these levels, dosing may be re-started at 5 mg twice daily and gradually increased based on careful monitoring of complete blood cell count, including a white blood cell count differential.

Dose reductions should be considered if the platelet count decreases below 100,000/mm3, with the goal of avoiding dose interruptions for thrombocytopenia. In PV, dose reductions should also be considered if haemoglobin decreases below 12 g/dl and is recommended if it decreases below 10 g/dl.

If efficacy is considered insufficient and blood counts are adequate, doses may be increased by a maximum of 5 mg twice daily, up to the maximum dose of 25 mg twice daily.

The starting dose should not be increased within the first four weeks of treatment and thereafter no more frequently than at 2-week intervals.

The maximum dose of ruxolitinib is 25 mg twice daily.

Dose adjustment with concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or fluconazole

When ruxolitinib is administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or dual inhibitors of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 enzymes (e.g. fluconazole) the unit dose of ruxolitinib should be reduced by approximately 50%, to be administered twice daily. Avoid the concomitant use of ruxolitinib with fluconazole doses greater than 200 mg daily.

More frequent monitoring (e.g. twice a week) of haematology parameters and of clinical signs and symptoms of ruxolitinib-related adverse drug reactions is recommended while on strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or dual inhibitors of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 enzymes.

Special populations

Renal impairment

No specific dose adjustment is needed in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment.

In patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min) the recommended starting dose based on platelet count for MF patients should be reduced by approximately 50% to be administered twice daily. The recommended starting dose for PV patients with severe renal impairment is 5 mg twice daily. Patients should be carefully monitored with regard to safety and efficacy during ruxolitinib treatment.

There are limited data to determine the best dosing options for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on haemodialysis. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulations based on available data in this population suggest that the starting dose for MF patients with ESRD on haemodialysis is a single dose of 15-20 mg or two doses of 10 mg given 12 hours apart, to be administered post-dialysis and only on the day of haemodialysis. A single dose of 15 mg is recommended for MF patients with platelet count between 100,000/mm3 and 200,000/mm3. A single dose of 20 mg or two doses of 10 mg given 12 hours apart is recommended for MF patients with platelet count of >200,000/mm3. Subsequent doses (single administration or two doses of 10 mg given 12 hours apart) should be administered only on haemodialysis days following each dialysis session.

The recommended starting dose for PV patients with ESRD on haemodialysis is a single dose of 10 mg or two doses of 5 mg given 12 hours apart, to be administered post-dialysis and only on the day of haemodialysis. These dose recommendations are based on simulations and any dose modification in ESRD should be followed by careful monitoring of safety and efficacy in individual patients. No data is available for dosing patients who are undergoing peritoneal dialysis or continuous venovenous haemofiltration.

Hepatic impairment

In patients with any hepatic impairment the recommended starting dose based on platelet count should be reduced by approximately 50% to be administered twice daily. Subsequent doses should be adjusted based on careful monitoring of safety and efficacy. Patients diagnosed with hepatic impairment while receiving ruxolitinib should have complete blood counts, including a white blood cell count differential, monitored at least every one to two weeks for the first 6 weeks after initiation of therapy with ruxolitinib and as clinically indicated thereafter once their liver function and blood counts have been stabilised. Ruxolitinib dose can be titrated to reduce the risk of cytopenia.

Elderly patients (>65 years)

No additional dose adjustments are recommended for elderly patients.

Paediatric population

The safety and efficacy of Джакави in children and adolescents aged up to 18 years have not been established. No data are available.

Treatment discontinuation

Treatment may be continued as long as the benefit-risk remains positive. However the treatment should be discontinued after 6 months if there has been no reduction in spleen size or improvement in symptoms since initiation of therapy.

It is recommended that, for patients who have demonstrated some degree of clinical improvement, ruxolitinib therapy be discontinued if they sustain an increase in their spleen length of 40% compared with baseline size (roughly equivalent to a 25% increase in spleen volume) and no longer have tangible improvement in disease-related symptoms.

Method of administration

Джакави is to be taken orally, with or without food.

If a dose is missed, the patient should not take an additional dose, but should take the next usual prescribed dose.

Special precautions for disposal and other handling

No special requirements.