Human experience with tipranavir overdose is very limited. No specific signs and symptoms of overdose are known. Generally, an increased frequency and higher severity of adverse reactions may result from overdose.
There is no known antidote for tipranavir overdose. Treatment of overdose should consist of general supportive measures, including monitoring of vital signs and observation of the patient's clinical status. If indicated, elimination of unabsorbed tipranavir should be achieved by emesis or gastric lavage. Administration of activated charcoal may also be used to aid in removal of unabsorbed substance. Since tipranavir is highly protein bound, dialysis is unlikely to be beneficial in significant removal of this medicine.
Patients with moderate or severe (Child-Pugh B or C) hepatic impairment.
Combination of rifampicin with Аптивус with concomitant low dose ritonavir is contraindicated.
Herbal preparations containing St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) due to the risk of decreased plasma concentrations and reduced clinical effects of tipranavir.
Co-administration of Аптивус with low dose ritonavir, with active substances that are highly dependent on CYP3A for clearance, and for which elevated plasma concentrations are associated with serious and/or life-threatening events. These active substances include antiarrhythmics (such as amiodarone, bepridil, quinidine), antihistamines (such as astemizole, terfenadine), ergot derivatives (such as dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, methylergonovine), gastrointestinal motility agents (such as cisapride), antipsychotics (such as pimozide, sertindole, quetiapine, lurasidone), sedatives/hypnotics (such as orally administered midazolam and triazolam) and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (such as simvastatin and lovastatin). Also the use of the alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist alfuzosin, and sildenafil when used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. In addition, co-administration of Аптивус with low dose ritonavir, and medicinal products that are highly dependent on CYP2D6 for clearance, such as the antiarrhythmics flecainide, propafenone and metoprolol given in heart failure.
Co-administration of colchicine with Аптивус/ritonavir in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.
Not applicable.
Summary of the safety profile
Amongst the most common adverse reactions reported for Аптивус were gastrointestinal complaints such as diarrhoea and nausea as well as hyperlipidaemia. The most serious adverse reactions include hepatic impairment and liver toxicity. Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) was only observed in post marketing experience.
| Аптивус co-administered with low dose ritonavir, has been associated with reports of significant liver toxicity. In Phase III RESIST trials, the frequency of transaminase elevations was significantly increased in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm compared to the comparator arm. Close monitoring is therefore needed in patients treated with Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. Limited data are currently available for the use of Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, in patients co-infected with hepatitis B or C. Аптивус should therefore be used with caution in patients co-infected with hepatitis B or C. Аптивус should be used in this patient population only if the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk, and with increased clinical and laboratory monitoring. |
Tabulated summary of adverse reactions
Assessment of adverse reactions from HIV-1 clinical study data is based on experience in all Phase II and III trials in adults treated with the 500 mg tipranavir with 200 mg ritonavir dose twice daily (n=1397) and are listed below by system organ class and frequency according to the following categories:
Very common (> 1/10), common (> 1/100 to <1/10), uncommon (>1/1,000 to <1/100), rare (>1/10,000 to <1/1,000)
Tabulated summary of adverse reactions associated with Аптивус based on clinical studies and post-marketing experience:
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | |
| uncommon | neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia |
| Immune system disorders | |
| uncommon | hypersensitivity |
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | |
| common | hypertriglyceridaemia, hyperlipidaemia |
| uncommon | anorexia, decreased appetite, weight decreased, hyperamylasaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus, hyperglycaemia |
| rare | dehydration |
| Psychiatric disorders | |
| uncommon | insomnia, sleep disorder |
| Nervous system disorders | |
| common | headache |
| uncommon | dizziness, neuropathy peripheral, somnolence |
| rare | intracranial haemorrhage* |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | |
| uncommon | dyspnoea |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | |
| very common | diarrhoea, nausea |
| common | vomiting, flatulence, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, dyspepsia |
| uncommon | gastrooesophageal reflux disease, pancreatitis |
| rare | lipase increased |
| Hepatobiliary disorders | |
| uncommon | hepatic enzyme increased (ALAT, ASAT), cytolytic hepatitis, liver function test abnormal (ALAT, ASAT), hepatitis toxic |
| rare | hepatic failure (including fatal outcome), hepatitis, hepatic steatosis, hyperbilirubinaemia |
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | |
| common | rash |
| uncommon | pruritus, exanthem |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | |
| uncommon | myalgia, muscle spasms |
| Renal and urinary disorders | |
| uncommon | renal failure |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | |
| common | fatigue |
| uncommon | pyrexia, influenza like illness, malaise |
* see section Description of selected adverse reactions “Bleeding†for source of information
Description of selected adverse reactions
The following clinical safety features (hepatotoxicity, hyperlipidaemia, bleeding events, rash) were seen at higher frequency among tipranavir with ritonavir treated patients when compared with the comparator arm treated patients in the RESIST trials, or have been observed with tipranavir with ritonavir administration. The clinical significance of these observations has not been fully explored.
Hepatotoxicity
After 48 weeks of follow-up, the frequency of Grade 3 or 4 ALAT and/or ASAT abnormalities was higher in tipranavir with ritonavir patients compared with comparator arm patients (10% and 3.4%, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that baseline ALAT or ASAT above DAIDS Grade 1 and co-infection with hepatitis B or C were risk factors for these elevations. Most patients were able to continue treatment with tipranavir with ritonavir.
Metabolic parameters
Weight and levels of blood lipids and glucose may increase during antiretroviral therapy
Hyperlipidaemia
Grade 3 or 4 elevations of triglycerides occurred more frequently in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm compared with the comparator arm. At 48 weeks these rates were 25.2% of patients in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm and 15.6% in the comparator arm.
Bleeding
This adverse reaction was identified through post-marketing surveillance but not observed in randomised controlled clinical trials (n=6300).
RESIST participants receiving tipranavir with ritonavir tended to have an increased risk of bleeding; at 24 weeks the relative risk was 1.98 (95% CI=1.03, 3.80). At 48-weeks the relative risk decreased to 1.27 (95% CI=0.76, 2.12). There was no pattern for the bleeding events and no difference between treatment groups in coagulation parameters. The significance of this finding is being further monitored.
Fatal and non-fatal intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) have been reported in patients receiving tipranavir, many of whom had other medical conditions or were receiving concomitant medicinal products that may have caused or contributed to these events. However, in some cases the role of tipranavir cannot be excluded. No pattern of abnormal haematological or coagulation parameters has been observed in patients in general, or preceding the development of ICH. Therefore, routine measurement of coagulation parameters is not currently indicated in the management of patients on Аптивус.
An increased risk of ICH has previously been observed in patients with advanced HIV disease/AIDS such as those treated in the Аптивус clinical trials.
Rash
An interaction study in women between tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and ethinyl oestradiol/norethindrone demonstrated a high frequency of non-serious rash.). No cases of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis have been reported in the clinical development programme of tipranavir.
Laboratory abnormalities
Frequencies of marked clinical laboratory abnormalities (Grade 3 or 4) reported in at least 2% of patients in the tipranavir with ritonavir arms in the phase III clinical studies (RESIST-1 and RESIST-2) after 48-weeks were increased ASAT (6.1%), increased ALAT (9.7%), increased amylase (6.0%), increased cholesterol (4.2%), increased triglycerides (24.9%), and decreased white blood cell count (5.7%).
Increased CPK, myalgia, myositis and, rarely, rhabdomyolysis, have been reported with protease inhibitors, particularly in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
In HIV-infected patients with severe immune deficiency at the time of initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), an inflammatory reaction to asymptomatic or residual opportunistic infections may arise. Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves' disease) have also been reported; however, the reported time to onset is more variable and these events can occur many months after initiation of treatment. Reactivation of herpes simplex and herpes zoster virus infections were observed in the RESIST trials.
Cases of osteonecrosis have been reported, particularly in patients with generally acknowledged risk factors, advanced HIV disease or long-term exposure to combination antiretroviral therapy (CART). The frequency of this is unknown.
Paediatric population
In an open-label, dose-finding study of tipranavir plus ritonavir (Trial 1182.14), 62 children aged 2 to 12 years received Аптивус oral solution. In general, adverse reactions were similar to those seen in adults, with the exception of vomiting, rash and pyrexia which were reported more frequently in children than in adults. The most frequently reported moderate or severe adverse reactions in the 48 week analyses are noted below.
Most frequently reported moderate or severe adverse reactions in paediatric patients age 2 to < 12 years (reported in 2 or more children, Trial 1182.14, 48 weeks analyses, Full Analysis Set).
| Total patients treated (N) | 62 |
| Events [N(%)] | |
| Diarrhoea | 4 (6.5) |
| Vomiting | 3 (4.8) |
| Nausea | 3 (4.8) |
| Abdominal pain1 | 3 (4.8) |
| Pyrexia | 4 (6.5) |
| Rash2 | 4 (6.5) |
| gamma GT increased | 4 (6.5) |
| ALAT increased | 2 (3.2) |
| Anaemia | 2 (3.2) |
1 Includes abdominal pain (N=1), dysphagia (N=1) and epigastric discomfort (N=1).
2 Rash consists of one or more of the preferred terms of rash, drug eruption, rash macular, rash papular, erythema, rash maculo-papular, rash pruritic, and urticaria.
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via:
United Kingdom
Yellow Card Scheme
Website: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App store
Ireland
HPRA Pharmacovigilance
Earlsfort Terrace
IRL - Dublin 2
Tel: +353 1 6764971
Fax: +353 1 6762517
Website: www.hpra.ie
e-mail: [email protected]
Malta
ADR Reporting
Website: www.medicinesauthority.gov.mt/adrportal
Animal toxicology studies have been conducted with tipranavir alone, in mice, rats and dogs, and co-administered with ritonavir (3.75:1 w/w ratio) in rats and dogs. Studies with co-administration of tipranavir and ritonavir did not reveal any additional toxicological effects when compared to those seen in the tipranavir single agent toxicological studies.
The predominant effects of repeated administration of tipranavir across all species toxicologically tested were on the gastrointestinal tract (emesis, soft stool, diarrhoea) and the liver (hypertrophy). The effects were reversible with termination of treatment. Additional changes included bleeding in rats at high doses (rodents specific). Bleeding observed in rats was associated with prolonged prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and a decrease in some vitamin K dependent factors. The co-administration of tipranavir with vitamin E in the form of TPGS (d-alphatocopherol polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate) from 2,322 IU/m2 upwards in rats resulted in a significant increase in effects on coagulation parameters, bleeding events and death. In preclinical studies of tipranavir in dogs, an effect on coagulation parameters was not seen. Co-administration of tipranavir and vitamin E has not been studied in dogs.
The majority of the effects in repeat-dose toxicity studies appeared at systemic exposure levels which are equivalent to or even below the human exposure levels at the recommended clinical dose.
In in vitro studies, tipranavir was found to inhibit platelet aggregation when using human platelets and thromboxane A2 binding in an in vitro cell model at levels consistent with exposure observed in patients receiving Аптивус with ritonavir. The clinical implications of these findings are not known.
In a study conducted in rats with tipranavir at systemic exposure levels (AUC) equivalent to human exposure at the recommended clinical dose, no adverse effects on mating or fertility were observed. At maternal doses producing systemic exposure levels similar to or below those at the recommended clinical dose, tipranavir did not produce teratogenic effects. At tipranavir exposures in rats at 0.8-fold human exposure at the clinical dose, foetal toxicity (decreased sternebrae ossification and body weights) was observed. In pre- and post-natal development studies with tipranavir in rats, growth inhibition of pups was observed at maternally toxic doses approximating 0.8-fold human exposure.
Carcinogenicity studies of tipranavir in mice and rats revealed tumourigenic potential specific for these species, which are regarded as of no clinical relevance. Tipranavir showed no evidence of genetic toxicity in a battery of in vitro and in vivo tests.
Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is indicated for combination antiretroviral treatment of HIV-1 infection in highly pre-treated children from 2 to 12 years of age with virus resistant to multiple protease inhibitors. Аптивус should only be used as part of an active combination antiretroviral regimen in patients with no other therapeutic options.
In deciding to initiate treatment with Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, careful consideration should be given to the treatment history of the individual patient and the patterns of mutations associated with different agents. Genotypic or phenotypic testing (when available) and treatment history should guide the use of Аптивус. Initiation of treatment should take into account the combinations of mutations which may negatively impact the virological response to Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir.
Pharmacotherapeutic group: antivirals for systemic use, protease inhibitors, ATC code: J05AE09
Mechanism of action
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) encodes an aspartyl protease that is essential for the cleavage and maturation of viral protein precursors. Tipranavir is a non-peptidic inhibitor of the HIV-1 protease that inhibits viral replication by preventing the maturation of viral particles.
Antiviral activity in vitro
Tipranavir inhibits the replication of laboratory strains of HIV-1 and clinical isolates in acute models of T-cell infection, with 50% and 90% effective concentrations (EC50 and EC90) ranging from 0.03 to 0.07 µM (18-42 ng/ml) and 0.07 to 0.18 µM (42-108 ng/ml), respectively. Tipranavir demonstrates antiviral activity in vitro against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M non-clade B isolates (A, C, D, F, G, H, CRF01 AE, CRF02 AG, CRF12 BF). Group O and HIV-2 isolates have reduced susceptibility in vitro to tipranavir with EC50 values ranging from 0.164-1 µM and 0.233-0.522 µM, respectively. Protein binding studies have shown that the antiviral activity of tipranavir decreases on average 3.75-fold in conditions where human serum is present.
Resistance
The development of resistance to tipranavir in vitro is slow and complex. In one particular in vitro resistance experiment, an HIV-1 isolate that was 87-fold resistant to tipranavir was selected after 9 months, and contained 10 mutations in the protease: L10F, I13V, V32I, L33F, M36I, K45I, I54V/T, A71V, V82L, I84V as well as a mutation in the gag polyprotein CA/P2 cleavage site. Reverse genetic experiments showed that the presence of 6 mutations in the protease (I13V, V32I, L33F, K45I, V82L, I84V) was required to confer > 10-fold resistance to tipranavir while the full 10-mutation genotype conferred 69-fold resistance to tipranavir. In vitro, there is an inverse correlation between the degree of resistance to tipranavir and the capacity of viruses to replicate. Recombinant viruses showing > 3-fold resistance to tipranavir grow at less than 1% of the rate detected for wild type HIV-1 in the same conditions. Tipranavir resistant viruses which emerge in vitro from wild-type HIV-1 show decreased susceptibility to the protease inhibitors amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir and ritonavir but remain sensitive to saquinavir.
Through a series of multiple stepwise regression analyses of baseline and on-treatment genotypes from all clinical studies, 16 amino acids have been associated with reduced tipranavir susceptibility and/or reduced 48-week viral load response: 10V, 13V, 20M/R/V, 33F, 35G, 36I, 43T, 46L, 47V, 54A/M/V, 58E, 69K, 74P, 82L/T, 83D and 84V. Clinical isolates that exhibited a > 10-fold decrease in tipranavir susceptibility harboured 8 or more tipranavir-associated mutations. In Phase II and III clinical trials, 276 patients with on-treatment genotypes have demonstrated that the predominant emerging mutations with tipranavir treatment are L33F/I/V, V82T/L and I84V. Combination of all three of these is usually required for reduced susceptibility. Mutations at position 82 occur via two pathways: one from pre-existing mutation 82A selecting to 82T, the other from wild type 82V selecting to 82L.
Cross-resistance
Tipranavir maintains significant antiviral activity (< 4-fold resistance) against the majority of HIV-1 clinical isolates showing post-treatment decreased susceptibility to the currently approved protease inhibitors: amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir. Greater than 10-fold resistance to tipranavir is uncommon (< 2.5% of tested isolates) in viruses obtained from highly treatment experienced patients who have received multiple peptidic protease inhibitors.
ECG evaluation
The effect of tipranavir with low dose of ritonavir on the QTcF interval was measured in a study in which 81 healthy subjects received the following treatments twice daily for 2.5 days: tipranavir/ritonavir (500/200 mg), tipranavir/ritonavir at a supra-therapeutic dose (750/200 mg), and placebo/ritonavir (-/200 mg). After baseline and placebo adjustment, the maximum mean QTcF change was 3.2 ms (1-sided 95% Upper CI: 5.6 ms) for the 500/200 mg dose and 8.3 ms (1-sided 95% Upper CI: 10.8 ms) for the supra-therapeutic 750/200 mg dose. Hence tipranavir at therapeutic dose with low dose of ritonavir did not prolong the QTc interval but may do so at supratherapeutic dose.
Clinical pharmacodynamic data
This indication is based on the results of one phase II study investigating pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of Аптивус oral solution in mostly treatment-experienced children aged 2 to 12 years.
The following clinical data is derived from analyses of 48-week data from ongoing studies (RESIST-1 and RESIST-2) measuring effects on plasma HIV RNA levels and CD4 cell counts. RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 are ongoing, randomised, open-label, multicentre studies in HIV-positive, triple-class experienced patients, evaluating treatment with tipranavir 500 mg co-administered with low dose ritonavir 200 mg (twice daily) plus an optimised background regimen (OBR) individually defined for each patient based on genotypic resistance testing and patient history. The comparator regimen included a ritonavir-boosted PI (also individually defined) plus an OBR. The ritonavir-boosted PI was chosen from among saquinavir, amprenavir, indinavir or lopinavir/ritonavir.
All patients had received at least two PI-based antiretroviral regimens and were failing a PI-based regimen at the time of study entry. At least one primary protease gene mutation from among 30N, 46I, 46L, 48V, 50V, 82A, 82F, 82L, 82T, 84V or 90M had to be present at baseline, with not more than two mutations on codons 33, 82, 84 or 90.
After Week 8, patients in the comparator arm who met the protocol defined criteria of initial lack of virologic response had the option of discontinuing treatment and switching over to tipranavir with ritonavir in a separate roll-over study.
The 1483 patients included in the primary analysis had a median age of 43 years (range 17-80), were 86% male, 75% white, 13% black and 1% Asian. In the tipranavir and comparator arms median baseline CD4 cell counts were 158 and 166 cells/mm3, respectively, (ranges 1-1893 and 1-1184 cells/mm3); median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.79 and 4.80 log10 copies/ml, respectively (ranges 2.34-6.52 and 2.01-6.76 log10 copies/ml).
Patients had prior exposure to a median of 6 NRTIs, 1 NNRTI, and 4 PIs. In both studies, a total of 67% patient viruses were resistant and 22% were possibly resistant to the pre-selected comparator PIs. A total of 10% of patients had previously used enfuvirtide. Patients had baseline HIV-1 isolates with a median of 16 HIV-1 protease gene mutations, including a median of 3 primary protease gene mutations D30N, L33F/I, V46I/L, G48V, I50V, V82A/F/T/L, I84V, and L90M. With respect to mutations on codons 33, 82, 84 and 90 approximately 4% had no mutations, 24% had mutations at codons 82 (less than 1% of patients had the mutation V82L) and 90, 18% had mutations at codons 84 and 90 and 53% had at least one key mutation at codon 90. One patient in the tipranavir arm had four mutations. In addition the majority of participants had mutations associated with both NRTI and NNRTI resistance. Baseline phenotypic susceptibility was evaluated in 454 baseline patient samples. There was an average decrease in susceptibility of 2-fold wild type (WT) for tipranavir, 12-fold WT for amprenavir, 55-fold WT for atazanavir, 41-fold WT for indinavir, 87-fold WT for lopinavir, 41-fold WT for nelfinavir, 195-fold WT for ritonavir, and 20-fold WT for saquinavir.
Combined 48-week treatment response (composite endpoint defined as patients with a confirmed >1 log RNA drop from baseline and without evidence of treatment failure) for both studies was 34% in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm and 15% in the comparator arm. Treatment response is presented for the overall population (displayed by enfuvirtide use), and detailed by PI strata for the subgroup of patients with genotypically resistant strains in the Table below.
Treatment response* at week 48 (pooled studies RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 in treatment-experienced patients)
| RESIST study | Tipranavir /RTV | CPI/RTV** | p-value | ||
| n (%) | N | n (%) | N |
| |
| Overall population FAS PP |
255 (34.2) 171 (37.7) |
746 454 |
114 (15.5) 74 (17.1) |
737 432 |
<0.0001 <0.0001 |
| - with ENF (FAS) | 85 (50.0) | 170 | 28 (20.7) | 135 | <0.0001 |
| - without ENF (FAS) | 170 (29.5) | 576 | 86 (14.3) | 602 | <0.0001 |
| Genotypically Resistant |
|
|
|
|
|
| LPV/rtv FAS PP |
66 (28.9) 47 (32.2) |
228 146 |
23 (9.5) 13 (9.1) |
242 143 |
<0.0001 <0.0001 |
| APV/rtv FAS PP |
50 (33.3) 38 (39.2) |
150 97 |
22 (14.9) 17 (18.3) |
148 93 |
<0.0001 0.0010 |
| SQV/rtv FAS PP |
22 (30.6) 11 (28.2) |
72 39 |
5 (7.0) 2 (5.7) |
71 35 |
<0.0001 0.0650 |
| IDV/rtv FAS PP |
6 (46.2) 3 (50.0) |
13 6 |
1 (5.3) 1 (7.1) |
19 14 |
0.0026 0.0650 |
* Composite endpoint defined as patients with a confirmed 1 log RNA drop from baseline and without evidence of treatment failure
** Comparator PI/RTV: LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg twice daily (n=358), IDV/r 800 mg/100 mg twice daily (n=23), SQV/r 1000 mg/100 mg twice daily or 800 mg/200 mg twice daily (n=162), APV/r 600 mg/100 mg twice daily (n=194)
ENF Enfuvirtide; FAS Full Analysis Set; PP Per Protocol; APV/rtv Amprenavir/ritonavir; IDV/rtv
Indinavir/ritonavir; LPV/rtv Lopinavir/ritonavir; SQV/rtv Saquinavir/ritonavir
Combined 48-week median time to treatment failure for both studies was 115 days in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm and 0 days in the comparator arm (no treatment response was imputed to day 0).
Through 48 weeks of treatment, the proportion of patients in the tipranavir with ritonavir arm compared to the comparator PI/ritonavir arm with HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml was 30% and 14% respectively, and with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml was 23% and 10% respectively. Among all randomised and treated patients, the median change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA at the last measurement up to Week 48 was -0.64 log10 copies/ml in patients receiving tipranavir with ritonavir versus -0.22 log10 copies/ml in the comparator PI/ritonavir arm.
Among all randomised and treated patients, the median change from baseline in CD4+ cell count at the last measurement up to Week 48 was +23 cells/mm3 in patients receiving tipranavir with ritonavir (N=740) versus +4 cells/mm3 in the comparator PI/ritonavir (N=727) arm.
The superiority of tipranavir co-administered with low dose ritonavir over the comparator protease inhibitor/ritonavir arm was observed for all efficacy parameters at week 48. It has not been shown that tipranavir is superior to these boosted comparator protease inhibitors in patients harbouring strains susceptible to these protease inhibitors. RESIST data also demonstrate that tipranavir co-administered with low dose ritonavir exhibits a better treatment response at 48 weeks when the OBR contains genotypically available antiretroviral agents (e.g. enfuvirtide).
At present there are no results from controlled trials evaluating the effect of tipranavir on clinical progression of HIV.
Paediatric population
HIV-positive, paediatric patients, aged 2 through 18 years, were studied in a randomized, open-label, multicenter study (trial 1182.14). Patients were required to have a baseline HIV-1 RNA concentration of at least 1500 copies/ml, were stratified by age (2 to < 6 years, 6 to < 12 years and 12 to 18 years) and randomized to receive one of two tipranavir with ritonavir dose regimens: 375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2 dose, compared to the 290 mg/m2/115 mg/m2 dose, plus background therapy of at least two non-protease inhibitor antiretroviral medicinal products, optimized using baseline genotypic resistance testing. All patients initially received Аптивус oral solution. Paediatric patients who were 12 years or older and received the maximum dose of 500 mg/200 mg twice daily could change to Аптивус capsules from study day 28. The trial evaluated pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, as well as virologic and immunologic responses through 48 weeks.
The available clinical data do not support the use of Аптивус oral solution in adolescents or adults. Compared to the capsules, tipranavir exposure is higher when administering the same dose as oral solution. Due to this and to the high vitamin E content of the oral solution, the risk of adverse reactions (type, frequency and/or severity) may be higher than with the capsule formulation.
In patients less than 12 years of age, however, the oral solution is the only available option for treatment with tipranavir, as no data are available on the efficacy and safety of Аптивус capsules in children less than 12 years of age.). Moreover, in patients with a body surface area of less than 1.33 m2 appropriate dose adjustments cannot be achieved with the capsule formulation. These factors lead to the conclusion that the benefits outweigh the risks of Аптивус oral solution only in children between 2 and 12 years of age without any other therapeutic option.
The baseline characteristics and the key efficacy results at 48 weeks for the paediatric patients receiving Аптивус oral solution are displayed in the tables below.
Baseline characteristics for patients 2 - <12 years treated with Аптивус oral solution
| Variable | Value | |
| Number of Patients | 62 | |
| Age-Median (years) | 8.1 | |
| Gender | % Male | 59.7% |
| Race | % White | 71.0% |
| % Black | 25.8% | |
| % Asian | 3.2% | |
| Baseline HIV-1 RNA (log10 copies/ml) | Median (Min - Max) | 4.8 (3.3 - 6.0) |
| % with VL > 100,000 copies/ml | 37.1% | |
| Baseline CD4+ (cells/mm3) | Median (Min - Max) | 600 (24 - 2578) |
| % ≤ 200 | 15.5% | |
| Baseline % CD4+ cells | Median (Min - Max) | 21.9% (1.5% - 44.0%) |
| Previous ADI* | % with Category C | 48.4% |
| Treatment history | % with any ARV | 96.8% |
| Median # previous NRTIs | 4 | |
| Median # previous NNRTIs | 1 | |
| Median # previous PIs | 1 | |
* AIDS defining illness
Key efficacy results at 48 weeks for patients 2 - <12 years treated with Аптивус oral solution
| Endpoint | Result |
| Number of patients | 62 |
| Primary efficacy endpoint: % with VL < 400 | 50.0% |
| Median change from baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA (copies/ml) | -2.06 |
| Median change from baseline in CD4+ cell count (cells/mm3) | 167 |
| Median change from baseline in % CD4+ cells | 5% |
Analyses of tipranavir resistance in treatment experienced patients
Tipranavir with ritonavir response rates in the RESIST studies were assessed by baseline tipranavir genotype and phenotype. Relationships between baseline phenotypic susceptibility to tipranavir, primary PI mutations, protease mutations at codons 33, 82, 84 and 90, tipranavir resistance-associated mutations, and response to tipranavir with ritonavir therapy were assessed.
Of note, patients in the RESIST studies had a specific mutational pattern at baseline of at least one primary protease gene mutation among codons 30N, 46I, 46L, 48V, 50V, 82A, 82F, 82L, 82T, 84V or 90M, and no more than two mutations on codons 33, 82, 84 or 90.
The following observations were made:
- Primary PI mutations
Analyses were conducted to assess virological outcome by the number of primary PI mutations (any change at protease codons 30, 32, 36, 46, 47, 48, 50, 53, 54, 82, 84, 88 and 90) present at baseline. Response rates were higher in tipranavir with ritonavir patients than comparator PI boosted with ritonavir in new enfuvirtide patients, or patients without new enfuvirtide. However, without new enfuvirtide some patients began to lose antiviral activity between weeks 4 and 8.
- Mutations at protease codons 33, 82, 84 and 90
A reduced virological response was observed in patients with viral strains harbouring two or more mutations at HIV protease codons 33, 82, 84 or 90, and not receiving new enfuvirtide.
- Tipranavir resistance-associated mutations
Virological response to tipranavir with ritonavir therapy has been evaluated using a tipranavir-associated mutation score based on baseline genotype in RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 patients. This score (counting the 16 amino acids that have been associated with reduced tipranavir susceptibility and/or reduced viral load response: 10V, 13V, 20M/R/V, 33F, 35G, 36I, 43T, 46L, 47V, 54A/M/V, 58E, 69K, 74P, 82L/T, 83D and 84V) was applied to baseline viral protease sequences. A correlation between the tipranavir mutation score and response to tipranavir with ritonavir therapy at week 48 has been established.
This score has been determined from the selected RESIST patient population having specific mutation inclusion criteria and therefore extrapolation to a wider population mandates caution.
At 48-weeks, a higher proportion of patients receiving tipranavir with ritonavir achieved a treatment response in comparison to the comparator protease inhibitor/ritonavir for nearly all of the possible combinations of genotypic resistance mutations (see table below).
Proportion of patients achieving treatment response at Week 48 (confirmed > 1 log10 copies/ml decrease in viral load compared to baseline), according to tipranavir baseline mutation score and enfuvirtide use in RESIST patients
| New ENF | No New ENF* | |
| Number of TPV Score Mutations** | TPV/r | TPV/r |
| 0,1 | 73% | 53% |
| 2 | 61% | 33% |
| 3 | 75% | 27% |
| 4 | 59% | 23% |
| > 5 | 47% | 13% |
| All patients | 61% | 29% |
* Includes patients who did not receive ENF and those who were previously treated with and continued ENF
**Mutations in HIV protease at positions L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, 58E, H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D or I84V
ENF Enfuvirtide; TPV/r Tipranavir with ritonavir
Sustained HIV-1 RNA decreases up to week 48 were mainly observed in patients who received tipranavir with ritonavir and new enfuvirtide. If patients did not receive tipranavir with ritonavir with new enfuvirtide, diminished treatment responses at week 48 were observed, relative to new enfuvirtide use (see Table below).
Mean decrease in viral load from baseline to week 48, according to tipranavir baseline mutation score and enfuvirtide use in RESIST patients
| New ENF | No New ENF* | |
| Number of TPV Score Mutations** | TPV/r | TPV/r |
| 0, 1 | -2.3 | -1.6 |
| 2 | -2.1 | -1.1 |
| 3 | -2.4 | -0.9 |
| 4 | -1.7 | -0.8 |
| > 5 | -1.9 | -0.6 |
| All patients | -2.0 | -1.0 |
* Includes patients who did not receive ENF and those who were previously treated with and continued ENF
** Mutations in HIV protease at positions L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, 58E, H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D or I84V
ENF Enfuvirtide; TPV/r Tipranavir with ritonavir
- Tipranavir phenotypic resistance
Increasing baseline phenotypic fold change to tipranavir in isolates is correlated to decreasing virological response. Isolates with baseline fold change of >0 to 3 are considered susceptible; isolates with >3 to 10 fold changes have decreased susceptibility; isolates with >10 fold changes are resistant.
Conclusions regarding the relevance of particular mutations or mutational patterns are subject to change with additional data, and it is recommended to always consult current interpretation systems for analysing resistance test results.
In order to achieve effective tipranavir plasma concentrations and a twice daily dosing regimen, coadministration of tipranavir with low dose ritonavir twice daily is essential. Ritonavir acts by inhibiting hepatic cytochrome P450 CYP3A, the intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump and possibly intestinal cytochrome P450 CYP3A as well. As demonstrated in a dose-ranging evaluation in 113 HIV-negative healthy male and female volunteers, ritonavir increases AUC0-12h, Cmax and Cmin and decreases the clearance of tipranavir. 500 mg tipranavir co-administered with low dose ritonavir (200 mg; twice daily) was associated with a 29-fold increase in the geometric mean morning steady-state trough plasma concentrations compared to tipranavir 500 mg twice daily without ritonavir.
Absorption
Absorption of tipranavir in humans is limited, though no absolute quantification of absorption is available. Tipranavir is a P-gp substrate, a weak P-gp inhibitor and appears to be a potent P-gp inducer as well. Data suggest that, although ritonavir is a P-gp inhibitor, the net effect of Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, at the proposed dose regimen at steady-state, is P-gp induction. Peak plasma concentrations are reached within 1 to 5 hours after dose administration depending upon the dosage used. With repeated dosing, tipranavir plasma concentrations are lower than predicted from single dose data, presumably due to hepatic enzyme induction. Steady-state is attained in most subjects after 7 days of dosing. Tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, exhibits linear pharmacokinetics at steady state.
Dosing with Аптивус capsules 500 mg twice daily concomitant with 200 mg ritonavir twice daily for 2 to 4 weeks and without meal restriction produced a mean tipranavir peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 94.8 ± 22.8 µM for female patients (n=14) and 77.6 ± 16.6 µM for male patients (n=106), occurring approximately 3 hours after administration. The mean steady-state trough concentration prior to the morning dose was 41.6 ± 24.3 µM for female patients and 35.6 ± 16.7 µM for male patients. Tipranavir AUC over a 12 hour dosing interval averaged 851 ± 309 µM-h (CL=1.15 l/h) for female patients and 710 ± 207 µM-h (CL=1.27 l/h) for male patients. The mean half-life was 5.5 (females) or 6.0 hours (males).
Effects of food on oral absorption
Food improves the tolerability of tipranavir with ritonavir. Therefore Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, should be given with food.
Absorption of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is reduced in the presence of antacids.
Distribution
Tipranavir is extensively bound to plasma proteins (>99.9%). From clinical samples of healthy volunteers and HIV-1 positive subjects who received tipranavir without ritonavir the mean fraction of tipranavir unbound in plasma was similar in both populations (healthy volunteers 0.015% ± 0.006%; HIV-positive subjects 0.019% ± 0.076%). Total plasma tipranavir concentrations for these samples ranged from 9 to 82 μM. The unbound fraction of tipranavir appeared to be independent of total concentration over this concentration range.
No studies have been conducted to determine the distribution of tipranavir into human cerebrospinal fluid or semen.
Biotransformation
In vitro metabolism studies with human liver microsomes indicated that CYP3A4 is the predominant CYP isoform involved in tipranavir metabolism.
The oral clearance of tipranavir decreased after the addition of ritonavir which may represent diminished first-pass clearance of the substance at the gastrointestinal tract as well as the liver.
The metabolism of tipranavir in the presence of low dose ritonavir is minimal. In a 14C-tipranavir human study (500 mg 14C-tipranavir with 200 mg ritonavir, twice daily), unchanged tipranavir was predominant and accounted for 98.4% or greater of the total plasma radioactivity circulating at 3, 8, or 12 hours after dosing. Only a few metabolites were found in plasma, and all were at trace levels (0.2% or less of the plasma radioactivity). In faeces, unchanged tipranavir represented the majority of faecal radioactivity (79.9% of faecal radioactivity). The most abundant faecal metabolite, at 4.9% of faecal radioactivity (3.2% of dose), was a hydroxyl metabolite of tipranavir. In urine, unchanged tipranavir was found in trace amounts (0.5% of urine radioactivity). The most abundant urinary metabolite, at 11.0% of urine radioactivity (0.5% of dose) was a glucuronide conjugate of tipranavir.
Elimination
Administration of 14C-tipranavir to subjects (n = 8) that received 500 mg tipranavir with 200 mg ritonavir twice daily dosed to steady-state demonstrated that most radioactivity (median 82.3%) was excreted in faeces, while only a median of 4.4% of the radioactive dose administered was recovered in urine. In addition, most radioactivity (56%) was excreted between 24 and 96 hours after dosing. The effective mean elimination half-life of tipranavir with ritonavir in healthy volunteers (n = 67) and HIV-infected adult patients (n = 120) was approximately 4.8 and 6.0 hours, respectively, at steady state following a dose of 500 mg/200 mg twice daily with a light meal.
Special populations
Although data available at this stage are currently limited to allow a definitive analysis, they suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile is unchanged in older people and comparable between races. By contrast, evaluation of the steady-state plasma tipranavir trough concentrations at 10-14 h after dosing from the RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 studies demonstrate that females generally had higher tipranavir concentrations than males. After four weeks of Аптивус 500 mg with 200 mg ritonavir (twice daily) the median plasma trough concentration of tipranavir was 43.9 µM for females and 31.1 µM for males. This difference in concentrations does not warrant a dose adjustment.
Renal impairment
Tipranavir pharmacokinetics have not been studied in patients with renal impairment. However, since the renal clearance of tipranavir is negligible, a decrease in total body clearance is not expected in patients with renal impairment.
Hepatic impairment
In a study comparing 9 patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) hepatic impairment to 9 controls, the single and multiple dose exposure of tipranavir and ritonavir were increased in patients with hepatic impairment but still within the range observed in clinical studies. No dosing adjustment is required in patients with mild hepatic impairment but patients should be closely monitored.
The influence of moderate (Child-Pugh B) or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment on the multiple dose pharmacokinetics of either tipranavir or ritonavir has so far not been investigated. Tipranavir is contraindicated in moderate or severe hepatic impairment.
Paediatric population
The oral solution has been shown to have greater bioavailability than the soft capsule formulation.
Аптивус must be administered with low dose ritonavir to ensure its therapeutic effect. Failure to correctly co-administer tipranavir with ritonavir will result in reduced plasma levels of tipranavir that may be insufficient to achieve the desired antiviral effect. Patients should be instructed accordingly.
Аптивус is not a cure for HIV-1 infection or AIDS. Patients receiving Аптивус or any other antiretroviral therapy may continue to develop opportunistic infections and other complications of HIV-1 infection.
While effective viral suppression with antiretroviral therapy has been proven to substantially reduce the risk of sexual transmission, a residual risk cannot be excluded. Precautions to prevent transmission should be taken in accordance with national guidelines.
Switching from Аптивус capsules to the oral solution
Аптивус capsules are not interchangeable with the oral solution. Compared to the capsules, tipranavir exposure is higher when administering the same dose as oral solution. Also, the composition of the oral solution is different from that of the capsules, with the high vitamin E content being especially noteworthy. Both of these factors may contribute to an increased risk of adverse reactions (type, frequency and/or severity). Therefore patients should not be switched from Аптивус capsules to Аптивус oral solution.
Switching from Аптивус oral solution to the capsules
Аптивус oral solution is not interchangeable with the capsules. Compared to the oral solution, tipranavir exposure is lower when administering the same dose as capsules. However, children previously treated with Аптивус oral solution and becoming 12 years of age should be switched to capsules, particularly because of the more favourable safety profile of the capsules. It has to be noted that the switch from the oral solution to the capsule formulation of Аптивус could be associated with decreased exposure. Therefore, it is recommended that patients switching from Аптивус oral solution to capsules at the age of 12 years are closely monitored for the virologic response of their antiretroviral regimen.
Liver disease
Аптивус is contraindicated in patients with moderate or severe (Child-Pugh Class B or C) hepatic insufficiency. Limited data are currently available for the use of Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, in patients co-infected with hepatitis B or C. Patients with chronic hepatitis B or C and treated with combination antiretroviral therapy are at an increased risk for severe and potentially fatal hepatic adverse reaction. Аптивус should be used in this patient population only if the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk, and with increased clinical and laboratory monitoring. In the case of concomitant antiviral therapy for hepatitis B or C, please refer also to the relevant Summary of Product Characteristics for these medicinal products.
Patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A) should be closely monitored.
Patients with pre-existing liver dysfunction including chronic active hepatitis have an increased frequency of liver function abnormalities during combination therapy and should be monitored according to standard practice. Аптивус with ritonavir should be discontinued once signs of worsening liver function occur in patients with pre-existing liver disease.
Аптивус co-administered with low dose ritonavir, has been associated with reports of clinical hepatitis and hepatic decompensation, including some fatalities. These have generally occurred in patients with advanced HIV disease taking multiple concomitant medicinal products. Caution should be exercised when administering Аптивус to patients with liver enzyme abnormalities or with a history of hepatitis. Increased ALAT/ASAT monitoring should be considered in these patients.
Аптивус therapy should not be initiated in patients with pre-treatment ASAT or ALAT greater than 5 times the Upper Limit Normal (ULN) until baseline ASAT/ALAT is stabilised at less than 5X ULN, unless the potential benefit justifies the potential risk.
Аптивус therapy should be discontinued in patients experiencing ASAT or ALAT elevations greater than 10X ULN, or developing signs or symptoms of clinical hepatitis during therapy. If another cause is identified (e.g. acute hepatitis A, B or C virus, gallbladder disease, other medicinal products), then rechallenge with Аптивус may be considered when ASAT/ALAT have returned to the patient's baseline levels.
Liver monitoring
Monitoring of hepatic tests should be done prior to initiation of therapy, after two, four and then every four weeks until 24 weeks, and then every eight to twelve weeks thereafter. Increased monitoring (i.e. prior to initiation of therapy, every two weeks during the first three months of treatment, then monthly until 48 weeks, and then every eight to twelve weeks thereafter) is warranted when Аптивус and low dose ritonavir are administered to patients with elevated ASAT and ALAT levels, mild hepatic impairment, chronic hepatitis B or C, or other underlying liver disease.
Treatment-naïve patients
In a study performed in antiretroviral naïve adult patients, tipranavir 500 mg with ritonavir 200 mg twice daily, as compared to lopinavir/ritonavir, was associated with an excess in the occurrence of significant (grade 3 and 4) transaminase elevations without any advantage in terms of efficacy (trend towards a lower efficacy). The study was prematurely stopped after 60 weeks.
Therefore, tipranavir with ritonavir should not be used in treatment-naïve patients.
Renal impairment
Since the renal clearance of tipranavir is negligible, increased plasma concentrations are not expected in patients with renal impairment.
Haemophilia
There have been reports of increased bleeding, including spontaneous skin haematomas and haemarthrosis in patients with haemophilia type A and B treated with protease inhibitors. In some patients additional Factor VIII was given. In more than half of the reported cases, treatment with protease inhibitors was continued or reintroduced if treatment had been discontinued. A causal relationship has been evoked, although the mechanism of action had not been elucidated. Haemophiliac patients should therefore be made aware of the possibility of increased bleeding.
Bleeding
RESIST participants receiving Аптивус with ritonavir tended to have an increased risk of bleeding; at 24 weeks the relative risk was 1.98 (95% CI=1.03, 3.80). At 48-weeks the relative risk decreased to 1.27 (95% CI=0.76, 2.12). There was no pattern for the bleeding events and no difference between treatment groups in coagulation parameters. The significance of this finding is being further monitored.
Fatal and non-fatal intracranial haemorrhages (ICH) have been reported in patients receiving Аптивус, many of whom had other medical conditions or were receiving concomitant medicinal products that may have caused or contributed to these events. However, in some cases the role of Аптивус cannot be excluded. No pattern of abnormal haematological or coagulation parameters has been observed in patients in general, or preceding the development of ICH. Therefore, routine measurement of coagulation parameters is not currently indicated in the management of patients on Аптивус.
An increased risk of ICH has previously been observed in patients with advanced HIV disease/AIDS such as those treated in the Аптивус clinical trials.
In in vitro experiments, tipranavir was observed to inhibit human platelet aggregation at levels consistent with exposures observed in patients receiving Аптивус with ritonavir.
In rats, co-administration with vitamin E increased the bleeding effects of tipranavir.
Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, should be used with caution in patients who may be at risk of increased bleeding from trauma, surgery or other medical conditions, or who are receiving medicinal products known to increase the risk of bleeding such as antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants or who are taking supplemental vitamin E. Patients taking Аптивус oral solution should be advised not to take any supplemental vitamin E.
Weight and metabolic parameters
An increase in weight and in levels of blood lipids and glucose may occur during antiretroviral therapy. Such changes may in part be linked to disease control and life style. For lipids, there is in some cases evidence for a treatment effect, while for weight gain there is no strong evidence relating this to any particular treatment. A higher increase of blood lipids were seen with tipranavir/ritonavir than with comparators (other protease inhibitors) in clinical trials. For monitoring of blood lipids and glucose reference is made to established HIV treatment guidelines. Lipid disorders should be managed as clinically appropriate.
Immune reactivation syndrome
In HIV-infected patients with severe immune deficiency at the time of institution of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), an inflammatory reaction to asymptomatic or residual opportunistic pathogens may arise and cause serious clinical conditions, or aggravation of symptoms. Typically, such reactions have been observed within the first few weeks or months of initiation of CART. Relevant examples are cytomegalovirus retinitis, generalised and/or focal mycobacterial infections and pneumocystis pneumonia. Any inflammatory symptoms should be evaluated and treatment instituted when necessary. In addition, reactivation of herpes simplex and herpes zoster has been observed in clinical studies with Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir.
Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves' disease) have also been reported to occur in the setting of immune reactivation; however, the reported time to onset is more variable and these events can occur many months after initiation of treatment.
Rash
Mild to moderate rashes including urticarial rash, maculopapular rash, and photosensitivity have been reported in subjects receiving Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir. At 48-weeks in Phase III trials, rash of various types was observed in 15.5% males and 20.5% females receiving Аптивус co-administered with low dose ritonavir. Additionally, in one interaction trial, in healthy female volunteers administered a single dose of ethinyl oestradiol followed by Аптивус co-administered with low dose ritonavir, 33% of subjects developed a rash. Rash accompanied by joint pain or stiffness, throat tightness, or generalized pruritus has been reported in both men and women receiving Аптивус co-administered with low dose ritonavir. In the paediatric clinical trial, the frequency of rash (all grades, all causality) through 48 weeks of treatment was higher than in adult patients.
Osteonecrosis
Although the aetiology is considered to be multifactorial (including corticosteroid use, alcohol consumption, severe immunosuppression, higher body mass index), cases of osteonecrosis have been reported particularly in patients with advanced HIV-disease and/or long-term exposure to combination antiretroviral therapy (CART). Patients should be advised to seek medical advice if they experience joint aches and pain, joint stiffness or difficulty in movement.
Interactions
The interaction profile of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is complex. The mechanisms and potential mechanisms contributing to the interaction profile of tipranavir are described.
Abacavir and zidovudine
The concomitant use of Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with zidovudine or abacavir, results in a significant decrease in plasma concentration of these nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Therefore, the concomitant use of zidovudine or abacavir with Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not-recommended unless there are no other available NRTIs suitable for patient management.
Protease inhibitors
Concomitant use of Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with the protease inhibitors amprenavir, lopinavir or saquinavir (each co-administered with low dose ritonavir) in a dual-boosted regimen, results in significant decreases in plasma concentrations of these protease inhibitors. A significant decrease in plasma concentrations of atazanavir and a marked increase of tipranavir and ritonavir concentrations was observed when Аптивус, associated with low dose ritonavir, was co-administered with atazanavir. No data are currently available on interactions of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with protease inhibitors other than those listed above. Therefore, the co-administration of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, with protease inhibitors is not recommended.
Oral contraceptives and oestrogens
Since levels of ethinyl oestradiol are decreased, the co-administration of Аптивус co-administered with low dose ritonavir is not recommended. Alternative or additional contraceptive measures are to be used when oestrogen based oral contraceptives are co-administered with Аптивус co-administered with low dose ritonavir. Patients using oestrogens as hormone replacement therapy should be clinically monitored for signs of oestrogen deficiency. Women using oestrogens may have an increased risk of non serious rash.
Anticonvulsants
Caution should be used when prescribing carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin. Аптивус may be less effective due to decreased tipranavir plasma concentrations in patients taking these agents concomitantly.
Halofantrine, lumefantrine
Due to their metabolic profile and inherent risk of inducing torsades de pointes, administration of halofantrine and lumefantrine with Аптивус co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended.
Fluticasone
Concomitant use of tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, and fluticasone or other glucocorticoids that are metabolised by CYP3A4 is not recommended unless the potential benefit of treatment outweighs the risk of systemic corticosteroid effects, including Cushing's syndrome and adrenal suppression.
Atorvastatin
Tipranavir, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, increases the plasma concentrations of atorvastatin. The combination is not recommended. Other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors should be considered such as pravastatin, fluvastatin or rosuvastatin. However, if atorvastatin is specifically required for patient management, it should be started with the lowest dose and careful monitoring is necessary.
Omeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors
The combined use of Аптивус with ritonavir with either omeprazole, esomeprazole or with other proton pump inhibitors is not recommended.
Colchicine
In patients with normal renal and hepatic function, a reduction in colchicine dosage or an interruption of colchicine treatment is recommended in co-administration.
Salmeterol
Concomitant use of salmeterol and Аптивус, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is not recommended.
Bosentan
Due to the marked hepatotoxicity of bosentan and the potential for increasing the liver toxicity associated with Аптивус,co-administered with low dose ritonavir, this combination is not recommended.
Dizziness, somnolence, and fatigue have been reported in some patients; therefore, caution should be recommended when driving a car or operating machinery. If patients experience fatigue, dizziness, or somnolence they should avoid potentially hazardous tasks such as driving or operating machinery.
| Аптивус must always be given with low dose ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer, and in combination with other antiretroviral medicinal products. The Summary of Product Characteristics of ritonavir must therefore be consulted prior to initiation of therapy with Аптивус (especially as regards the contraindications, warnings and undesirable effects sections). |
Аптивус should be prescribed by physicians who are experienced in the treatment of HIV-1 infection.
Аптивус with ritonavir should not be used in treatment-naïve patients.
Posology
The recommended dose for children (age 2 to 12 years) is 375 mg/m2 Аптивус co-administered with 150 mg/m2 ritonavir, twice daily. The paediatric dose should not exceed the 500 mg/200 mg dose.
| Аптивус/ritonavir dose (375 mg/m2 Аптивус + 150 mg/m2 ritonavir) | ||||
| BSA Range (m2) | Dose Аптивус (mg) | Volume Аптивус (ml) | Dose ritonavir (mg) | Volume ritonavir (ml) |
| 0.37 - 0.42 | 140 | 1.4 | 56 | 0.7 |
| 0.43 - 0.47 | 160 | 1.6 | 63 | 0.8 |
| 0.48 - 0.52 | 180 | 1.8 | 71 | 0.9 |
| 0.53 - 0.58 | 200 | 2 | 79 | 1 |
| 0.59 - 0.63 | 220 | 2.2 | 87 | 1.1 |
| 0.64 - 0.68 | 240 | 2.4 | 95 | 1.2 |
| 0.69 - 0.74 | 260 | 2.6 | 103 | 1.3 |
| 0.75 - 0.79 | 280 | 2.8 | 111 | 1.4 |
| 0.80 - 0.84 | 300 | 3 | 119 | 1.5 |
| 0.85 - 0.90 | 320 | 3.2 | 127 | 1.6 |
| 0.91 - 0.95 | 340 | 3.4 | 135 | 1.7 |
| 0.96 - 1.00 | 360 | 3.6 | 143 | 1.8 |
| 1.01 - 1.06 | 380 | 3.8 | 151 | 1.9 |
| 1.07 - 1.11 | 400 | 4 | 159 | 2 |
| 1.12 - 1.16 | 420 | 4.2 | 167 | 2.1 |
| 1.17 - 1.22 | 440 | 4.4 | 174 | 2.2 |
| 1.23 - 1.27 | 460 | 4.6 | 182 | 2.3 |
| 1.28 - 1.32 | 480 | 4.8 | 190 | 2.4 |
| > 1.33 | 500 | 5 | 200 | 2.5 |
Doses of ritonavir lower than 150 mg/m2 twice daily, should not be used as they might alter the efficacy profile of the combination.
Аптивус is available as soft capsules for adults and adolescents from 12 years of age (please refer to the respective SmPC for further details). Patients treated with Аптивус and reaching the age of 12 years should be switched to the capsule formulation.
Missed dose
Patients should be advised of the need to take Аптивус and ritonavir every day as prescribed. If a dose is missed by more than 5 hours, the patient should be instructed to wait and then to take the next dose of tipranavir and ritonavir at the regularly scheduled time. If a dose is missed by less than 5 hours, the patient should be instructed to take the missed dose immediately, and then to take the next dose of tipranavir and ritonavir at the regularly scheduled time.
Liver impairment
Tipranavir is metabolised by the hepatic system. Liver impairment could therefore result in an increase of tipranavir exposure and a worsening of its safety profile. Therefore, Аптивус should be used with caution, and with increased monitoring frequency, in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A). Аптивус is contraindicated in patients with moderate or severe (Child-Pugh Class B or C) hepatic impairment.
Renal impairment
No dosage adjustment is required in patients with renal impairment.
Paediatric population
The safety and efficacy of Аптивус in children under 2 years of age has not been established. No data are available.
Method of administration
Oral use.
Аптивус oral solution co-administered with low dose oral solution ritonavir should be taken with food.
Before taking Аптивус it should be checked that the oral solution is clear and whether there are crystals or other particles at the bottom of the bottle. A small amount of crystals may be observed in the bottle, which does not affect the potency or safety of the product. If observed, crystals are typically seen as a paper-thin layer on the bottom when the bottle is stored upright. Dosing by means of the measuring device remains accurate even when crystals are observed. If there is more than a thin layer of crystals at the bottom of the bottle or uncertainty about the amount of crystals observed, the bottle should be returned for a replacement as soon as possible. Until the bottle is exchanged the patient should continue to take the usual doses of the oral solution. Patients should be instructed to observe closely for crystals.
The exact dose should be measured using the supplied measuring syringe and adapter, as follows:
1. Open the bottle by pressing down on the cap and turning in an anti-clockwise direction.
2. Remove the syringe cap covering the tip of the oral syringe (the cap will not be attached if this is the first time the oral syringe has been used) and insert the oral syringe into the adapter located in the neck of the bottle. Make sure the oral syringe is tightly inserted.
3. Turn the bottle upside down and gently withdraw the required amount of Аптивус oral solution.
4. Administer Аптивус oral solution immediately. The maximum volume which can be withdrawn at one time is 5 ml (equivalent to 500 mg tipranavir), which is the maximum single dose for a child with BSA > 1.33 m2.
5. After use of the oral syringe, reapply the syringe cap.
No special requirements for disposal.
